Revised Law of Ownership of Handguns

On July 1, 2010, Mark Guarino's article "Ownership of Chicago's pistol under Chicago's revised gun law is allowed", the US Supreme Court ruled that the revised pistol order violating Chicago's 28 years I announced. Pistol banned. In the article, "It stipulates that a new rule for gun owner has to register guns to Chicago police. They must participate in the classroom and shooting ground training, they are special We must obtain city permits and national gun ID cards. "They want to ban every aspect of possession of firearms at home, but we are protected by the second amendment.

5-4: The court dismissed the law prohibiting the possession of pistols in Washington, DC. The court is unconstitutionally prohibiting individuals who possess certain types of firearms (including pistols), as the second revision proposal has determined that individuals guarantee the right to own firearms. Scalia is the fifth time Pistol's ban is considered unconstitutional. His successor can hold or refuse the view that the constitutional rights of individuals carrying a pistol take precedence over state law or local law.

In 2007, the US District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia adjudicated the Parker versus the District of Columbia. In this case, the court ruled that the DC law basically prohibiting the private possession of pistols in the area is unconstitutional. Specifically, anyone other than the appellant, the DC resident, the retired DC police who banned the registration of the pistol, was deprived of their second revision right. Legally owned firearms are required to remain unloaded and disassembled unless used for "legitimate entertainment purposes".

There are thousands of laws in the US that limit gun ownership in some way. Restrictions include latency, prohibition of weapons concealment, and prohibition of the possession of certain kinds of weapons such as pistols and military semiautomatic equipment. Gun control advocates support these laws. Because they want to eliminate negative externality, but reducing the ownership of cancer also eliminates positive externalities. In fact, gun control laws may exclude positive external factors rather than negative external factors, as citizens who comply with the law are more likely to comply with rules than criminals.

If the government prohibits the use of a pistol at home, the possession and use of firearms for entertainment and self-defense may be threatened. However, the National Rifle Association did not recognize that the crime rate will rise unless there is a law prohibiting the possession of guns. Accidents related to firearms and suicide are also common issues in this country. Many people believe that purchasing a gun for self-defense is the only answer to their security measures against foreign threats and it is also an examination of excessive government forces. "The founder is keen on the idea that self-sufficient armed citizens are the best way to protect freedom." (Jost, 2008, p. 893) But in the 1960's John F. Kennedy After President, Martin Luther King and Senator Robert Kennedy were assassinated, gun control became public opinion and controversy. It is a big problem. our