Review of James H. Cone's Martin & Malcolm & America: A Dream or A Nightmare

James H. Corn 's Martin & Malcolm & America: Remembering Dreams and Nightmares Martin & Malcolm & America: James H. Corn' s dream and nightmare is a close study of the relationship with each other and the significance to American society. . Before the reader understood why Martin and Malcol expressed such different views on citizenship, he first discussed the details of the social and economic lifestyles each proposed.

109 James Cohen believes that the two leaders found in opponents are actually complementary through his investigation of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King. Malcolm and Martin and the United States: A dream or a nightmare (New York: Orbis Books, 2001). Differences are usually about strategic and strategic problems. Part of the American vision as a dream or a nightmare is the product of a subjective experience in America. By ignoring sexual and sexual behavior, the civil rights movement and the black power movement could not recognize moving female movement. The expression of racial credibility tries to suppress the problem of competition with the representation of black nationalists' struggle. The ability to adapt to these broader social problems will mean a reduction in the post civil rights period as the class and gender issues become more prominent in the black community.

Unfortunately, the book on Malcolm's view on his racial discrimination also provides extensive details about his career and critical framework. The black theologian James H. Corn's "Martin and Malcolm and America: A Dream or a Nightmare" deal with the religious roots of Malcolm's morals and journalist Louis E. Romax's "Murdering the Negro" Social and political aspects of the view to be resolved. However, as a comparative study between King and Malcolm X, these two books capture our interests. Mr. Kohn, a professor at Union Theological Seminary in New York, was strongly influenced by King and Malcolm X. His books openly admit intellectual debt and inspiration.

The king's worshipers often call him a dreamer. In his book "Martin and Malcolm and the United States," James Cohen told that Malcolm X is aware of the limitations of Martin's dream, but that is a denial. It can be said that the dream of King Martin Road is narrow especially at the beginning of the civil rights movement. From the boycott of Montgomery Bus in 1955 to the end of the 1965 voting right bill see the fact that President Kim actually felt the law and recently achieved the goal of saying that it is creating social equality , He often protests it. Various Aspects of the Law From this, it can be said that the thought and view on King's civil rights is narrower than that of Malcolm X, and Malcolm X is farther from the comparison.