Review of Articles Regarding Racial Crime

In many New York Times criminal related articles, I chose three articles on racial crime. The earliest article published on December 16, 1883 covers a story titled "It was condemned to kill black people" and may be a murder. The date of the second article was December 16, 1933, a slightly sensational title, "Black hanged in Tennessee, foolishly treated sheriff said" actually, summarized the entire article . The latest of these three articles was entitled "Delegate was charged with racial assault for officials" on December 16, 1983. The earliest article explained the story of an African-American who was found dead more than a year ago.

This paper argues that interpersonal discrimination is an important cause of African-American crime and is the cause of racial differences in crime. Most modern racial and criminal investigations use a macro level approach that uses institutional racial discrimination as a factor indirectly forming crime rates through community level resources, but the risk of crime itself It is rare as a factor. Situational shots can not focus on micro sociological factors such as how racial influences interact. This creates a gap in our understanding of how racial differences in crime, especially micro-level racial discrimination, affect criminal behavior.

Racial discrimination, race - ethnicity and crime: micro sociological model of risk and resilience

Currently there are differences in the laws that manage different types of hatred crimes. Perpetrators of racially or religiously motivated hat offenses may be accused of certain crimes such as racial or religious serious harassment or strikes. However, perpetrators of homosexual hate crimes have been criticized for committing existing crimes such as attacks, and they are considering the motivation for homosexuality in the process of judgment. Articles 318 and 319 of the Penal Code stipulate that the temptation to hatred is a criminal act, "appeal, support, encourage or claim assassination of members based on color, race, religion" It has said. , Ethnic or sexually oriented group "

With regard to articles on Minnesota Law Review, I think that we can not draw too many conclusions from this article. He said it was not illegal to say that the president was accused of crime while he was still employed or civil crimes were investigated. He did not say that the Supreme Court misunderstood as Clinton v. Jones. What he said is that Congress should pass the rules to protect the president from such investigation. This actually means that the constitution itself does not disturb them. Of course, Congress has not passed such regulations yet. They did not accept his proposal, and I do not think Congress will pass such a law in the near future.