Displaying code between SVN, Git, Mercurial, CVS, and Perforce, discussing changes, sharing knowledge, and identifying defects
Convert code reviews into threaded discussions and comment on specific source lines, files, or entire change sets
Take an important step in a unified view of code activity for sending, comments, and comments
Improve code quality with data not fully reviewed for part of the codebase. Quickly check who may have review status and comments
Access full audit trail including details of all code review up to the history of specific review. If you have open comments, please customize Jira Software's workflow.
"The best thing about Atlassian products is flexibility: products do not want us to work, we work in the way we want."
SCM is usually used when dealing with software projects. If it is git, Mercurial, SVN is irrelevant. There is a branch in all of them, and there is a good way to resolve merge conflicts (well, SVN may not be that much). As a result, we already have a powerful branching technology that can effectively handle branch offices and their content. Be sure to subscribe to the PhraseApp blog and receive it, please send it directly to the inbox. Information on localization best practices, guidelines, tutorials, other industry insights on optimizing software translations, and cultural aspects of entering new markets are available. Do not miss it!
The main difference between GIT and other VCS (including Subversion and its companions) is how GIT thinks about that data. Conceptually, most other systems store information as a list of file-based changes. These systems (CVS, Subversion, Perforce, Bazaar etc) treat the saved information as a series of files and handle changes made to each file over time. GIT does not consider or save data in this way. Instead, GIT thinks that the data is similar to a snapshot of a series of microfile systems. Every time you commit or save the state of a project in GIT, basically the appearance of all the files at that point is recorded and the reference to the snapshot is saved. To improve efficiency, if the file has not been modified, GIT will not store the file again. It is the only link to the last stored same file. GIT thinks that data is close to snapshot stream