Retributive Justice: Let the Punishment Fit the Crime

Since the beginning of the 17th century, there has been a dramatic change in crime and punishment. In the meantime, my wife may have been convicted of blasphemous sins. In other words, I am married to my husband. Penalties for such crimes include the fact that the wife was trapped in rivers and ponds and avoided faeces still present in Kent Canterbury. For a nasty wife, Scold's Bridle is another form of penalty for me. She is puzzled because of her husband's behavior.

In most countries retaliatory justice is always the main reason for punishment. It includes Cesario Beccaria's popular adage of "to make punishment suitable for crime" or a more general "eye for the eyes" which is the dominant principle of old times. Retaliative justice deals with the proportionality of crime and punishment imposed on criminals. On the other hand, restorative justice deals with perpetrators' perpetration by personalization, keeping in mind what to do to transform perpetrators, protect them from crime and effectively reintegrate themselves into society . Rehabilitation, reform and reintegration are basic prerequisites. The growing interest in restorative justice is due to the increased evaluation and respect for human dignity.

Retaliatory justice requires punishment so as not to contradict crime, but the research showed that there is a negative aspect to the concept of retaliatory justice. Maiese (2004) argues that it is easy to concentrate on revenge and retaliatory justice if punishment is completely based on the extent of the crime. Maiese (2004) pointed out that "as in revenge, revenge reflects the proportion of the judicial scale and is a false response to innocent victims" (p.2). Some people support severe punishment for offenders, but there are feasible and effective alternatives to retaliatory justice, such as restorative justice and psychiatric prison housing.

According to the concept of retaliatory justice, past unfairness and misconduct must be punished. Those who commit war crimes and crimes against humanity should be treated as justice. Retaliation is usually done through an international court or court that conducts a war criminal judgment if unjust treatment is initiated at the beginning of the war or during the war. In other cases, human rights abuses are part of national policy. Most people think that government officials are responsible for the institutional policy of apartheid, enforced disappearance, torture or genocide. Such violations usually attract the attention of international courts or are heard in international courts. Punishment strengthens the rules of international law and it is believed that those who violate these rules deny an unfair advantage. In addition, many people believe that punishment prevents other minors from committing similar crimes.