Retributive and Restorative Justice

The emergence of restorative justice as an alternative model of criminal justice in the Western courts may have a significant impact on judicial psychology. Two different concepts of justice, restorative and retaliatory justice, are proposed to influence response to rule violations. Retaliatory justice refers primarily to the maintenance of justice by unilateral punishment and restorative justice refers to the maintenance of justice by reaffirming common value agreements in bilateral processes. In the symbolic sense of illegal activity, attention to status and power is mainly related to retaliatory justice, attention to shared value is mainly related to restorative justice. However, the core of these processes is in interpreting the relationship of identity by the parties, especially if they think that respondents share their identities with criminals. Concrete examples of intergroup violations and the significance of future research on restoring justice after violating rules

1 Eleanor · Hannon · Judas and Michael · Bryant, Criminal Justice: Punishment and Reconstruction, Reconsideration of Criminal Justice VS. Resurrection 1, 1 (2004) ("Our current criminal justice philosophy is the concept of retaliation, Especially given or required in punishment "2 Id.2 (" The criminal justice system is definitely in danger, currently 2 million people are imprisoned in the US. "Modern restorative justice The convention is relatively new

Restorative justice and retaliatory justice: opportunity to seek conflict of cooperation or justice Donald H. J. Hermann

Restorative justice is based on indigenous judicial customs, is the main form of modern righteousness, restorative justice is the reaction of "attention" (or female) to "crime" compared to "justice". There is a gap between the ideal of this conference and the reality, and sympathy and open attitude towards "other people" can express and reflect on their own opinions. The existence of new expectations on behavior and the existence of a new justice norm (or language) that emphasizes "repair" - all these are the cultural elements of the small number of participants, young people acquire these factors and expectations over adults It is difficult.

Which of the principles of retaliatory justice and paradigm of restorative justice is suitable for the Philippines? What is more in line with general welfare? Between retaliatory justice and restorative justice, will it effectively deal with the value of human dignity, even punishment? So, if it really switches from a revenge paradigm to restorative justice, will the new paradigm work? In addition, this survey is aimed at using the constitutional provisions and Philippine international documents to use the relationship between retaliation and restorative justice as a basis for imposing punishment by comparing their values ​​and principles. signature