Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation

Book review is a strange part of human behavior. Both the author and the reader believe that what they can decide is different from their bias. This may apply to other actions, but it seems common in book reviews.

Then, why do not you read through the book with the credentials that you possibly have. Please do not give up on all background information supporting this review. In any case, those who think this book is useful may read it, and people with narrow mind probably can not even do this.

"Reconsidering positive thinking" is probably one of the best self improvement tools ever. Unfortunately, it has to compete with material that is not much evidence. In addition, others tried to confirm this, and initially about 80% of self-help books did not have evidence and 95% of Internet-based self-help thought that they had no evidence to support it . However, the book is trying to provide "trust" to that book.

I may be able to bypass the first two-thirds of a book that supports WOOP, but I am very glad that I did not. For me, once I start using the WOOP method, it helps me to create a knowledge base. It is an example of what works and what goes wrong and summarizes how to use it. The last third of the book is a way to enhance the WOOP approach and emphasize that the order of "wishes / results / obstacles / plans" has not been rearranged (WOOP).

This is my idea - most people waste a lot of time trying to learn more about their position and their position in life. It can only be achieved one year after ten years. . . After a lifetime, they abandoned this method or failed. WOOP is genuine. Always allow you to redo your thoughts (desires / dreams) and start over again. I have already paid much attention to it. This is the first thing I used. And I immediately succeeded. This is everything you need to know

I tried to be positive, but it did not work. Professor of psychology at New York University, "Rethinking positive thinking: inside the new motive science" Gabriel Otttingen says that positive thinking is not enough. In fact, positive thinking can hinder you. "They have already experienced it positively in their minds, and they relaxed," she said. "These positive fantasies help us to explore various possibilities in the future, but it is difficult when we actually strive to actually achieve the necessary energy, which is weak. "

In her book "Reconsidering Positive Thinking: Inside the New Motivational Science", scientist Gabriel Ettingen introduces some findings of motivation and positive thinking. The more active people there are, the less successful it will be at that job. For example, very active ladies participating in the health program in the US are losing weight over women who are not so active in fact. Very active graduates actually earn less work and get less income than those somewhat skeptical. what's the issue? Positive people will have dual benefits if these spontaneous techniques are indeed effective: aggressiveness itself, more energy to dream will start to be done. But the reality is that the first part of the previous statement did not result, it consumes energy from the second part.

Gabriele Oettingen, professor of psychology at New York University and the University of Hamburg, explains the limits of positive thought using this joke. In a clever and comprehensive book, Dr. Oettingen critically reviewed the positive thinking in "Reconsidering Positive Thinking: In the New Motivational Science" and refine the reader more thoroughly based on reliable empirical evidence And make it useful. Understanding Traditional wisdom thinks that dreams should stimulate us to stimulate us and cause actions. Through testing, Dr. Ettingen recruited undergraduate groups and randomly assigned them to two groups. She instructed the first fantasy group to become a knockout the following week: good grades, wonderful parties etc, will be asked to record all the ideas and daydreams of the students of the next week.