Cultural diversity in the context of bioethics, such as doctors, nurses, members of the bioethics committee and policy makers, should be a decision maker and try to understand and respect as much as possible. This point, however, is not a central pillar of bioethics because it not only suffers empirical and conceptual serious limitations both in theory and practice, but also compromises the normative role of bioethics , It is impossible. Therefore, it destroys its bioethics. The foundation and reason for existence. - T. Bra Canovich
Imagine: You are crossing the big Cadillac luxury sedan in the rural paddy field in Bangladesh. On the way, you arrive at the fair in the village and I think it is difficult to sail on the market. How do you understand this situation? Are you to blame the crowd at the village trade fair? (Why can not they put the market on a narrow street?) Or do you ask about the wisdom of traveling in a luxury car in a rural environment? People who believe that cultural diversity has multiple "restrictions" on bioethics and believe that certain abstract moral principles can be universally applied (10 Have and Gordijn, 2011; Bracanovic, 2011) Curse the congestion of the trade fair. Instead of questioning the practicality of a luxury car as a car suitable for rural travel
We understand that bioethics is not a luxury car. The work of bioethics is different from driving a car, but the complexity of intercultural bioethics is not the same as sailing in a crowded village, but our metaphor is a modern day in a globalized world It is an understanding of modern bioethics. The problem is useful. In our article "Bioethical concerns are global and bioethics are Western" (Chattopadhyay and De Vries, 2008) I think the bioethics system should be appropriate and regional culture. Ten Have and Gordijn (2011) assert us that it "falls and even unfair" about bioethics and leads us to our duties. In another paper, Brakanovic (2011) asserted that "Respect for cultural diversity" is "unsustainable and misleading" and imposes a series of concepts and empirical constraints on bioethical discourses. "Blakanovic believes that 'cultural transformation' in bioethics is 'disregarding the typical normative role of bioethics, so it may damage its foundation.' Vicki supports a universal approach to ecological ethics
Like our colleagues, we are all workers in the field of bioethics; like them, we strive to protect and promote the welfare of people touched by biomedicine. The problem is, "How do you do your best?" Respect for cultural diversity is an ethical requirement and I believe it is the most appropriate way for "global bioethics". Below, the application of the "universal" principle does not promote respect and equity in medical and medical research, it shows that there is a possibility of actually harming people in fact.
Finally, cultural diversity foretails respecting human rights. "Maintaining cultural diversity is a moral requirement that can not be separated from respecting respect for human rights, which means human rights and fundamental freedoms, in particular commitments to ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples. We do not limit its scope. "(Article 4)
"Protecting cultural diversity is an indivisible moral requirement that respects human dignity, which means human rights and basic freedom, in particular commitment to ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples.Cultural rights are essential for human rights Universal, inseparable and interdependent (UNESCO, Declaration of the World Cultural Diversity, 2001) But the First World War and the Second World War hampered the rise of brutal democracy It was. Identification of threats to ideologies such as fascism and Nazism brought about a tragic result (Kym 1 icka, 1992), while the other minority was obliged to adopt the language which is the custom of the majority of groups. And deprived of religion and political rights