Introduction For a long time, people thought that there was only one way to train students. However, recently new approaches have emerged and are becoming more common. This is restorative justice. This approach includes repairing practices designed to teach long-term courses, but on the contrary, zero tolerance is a shorter solution. Zero tolerance is usually a punitive punishment for uncontrollable behavior, including detention, pauses, and banishment. There are various opinions about which method is suitable for students.
Recovery justice is another way to punish students, aiming to balance the process of being too tolerant and overly punitive. The purpose of restorative justice is not to punish them, but to find a solution in cooperation with students (victims and defendants). Restoration Justice aims to solve problems, implement fair punishment, and promote understanding and coordination of student behavior. In school, restorative justice seems like a collaborative discussion than the traditional punishment we know. The actual restoration judgment includes all related parties to discuss related events. Victims have the opportunity to share their feelings with the accused. Because the main purpose is to recover rather than punishment, repair actions must provide equal time for each party.
Recently, the school began pursuing restorative justice. This is also known as a restorative practice. It is seen as an alternative to the typical punishment / stoppage method used in history, and it is known that punishment for color students is excessively punished. Today, I will examine what recovery practices are and how they are looking at school. Shane Safir, Jen Adkins, Timothy Hilton, Crystal T. Laura, Mark Katz commented on this topic. In my BAM, I can hear a ten-minute conversation with Shane, Jen, Timothy. Radio programs You can also find lists and links to previous shows here.