Research philosophy refers to the development of knowledge used by researchers in research (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). In other words, it is this theory that leads researchers in research design, research strategy, questionnaire design and sampling (Malhotra, 2009). It is very important to clearly understand the research philosophy. Therefore, we can verify the hypotheses of the worldview included in the research philosophy we selected (whether they are appropriate).
Research philosophy is an important part of research methodology. Research philosophy is categorized as ontology, epistemology and value theory. These philosophical methods can determine which method and why researchers should use them and these methods are derived from research questions (Saunders, Lewis, & Thornhill, 2009). In research philosophy, there is an important assumption explaining researcher's perception of the world. These assumptions will determine approaches to research strategies and strategies.
The research philosophy you use contains important assumptions about how you observe the world. These assumptions will strengthen your research strategy and the approach you choose as part of the strategy. To some extent, the ideas you adopt are influenced by practical considerations. However, the main influence may be your special opinion on the relationship between knowledge and its development process. Researchers who are interested in facts such as resources necessary for the manufacturing process may be totally different views on researchers' attitudes toward researchers. The same manufacturing process. Not only are their strategies and methods significantly different, they also have opinions on important content, or more importantly what they think about useful content.
This part of the research highlights the important issues of student's discussion of doctoral studies on research philosophy and its classification. Of particular interest is the view on understanding and relevance of research philosophy in selecting research methods. The results show that doctoral students have similar confusion patterns in the classification and understanding of the research philosophies of different departments and years of research. 61.5% of students have expressed a discussion about different classifications and research philosophy, 7.7% of respondents were scientific and engineering students who have never heard about ontology, epistemology and chemical terms PhD studies The last year of. While focusing on the "qualitative - quantitative" argument, the other 30.8% of the research and teacher split years were not aware of the classification. This contrasts remarkably with 11.5%. This is easy to understand in research philosophy.