Republicans want to allow states to reject federal laws

Senator Republicans submitted a Constitutional amendment on Thursday and allowed the state to dismiss Federal laws such as Obama's medical reform

Sens. Mike Enzi (R - Wyo), John Cornyn (R - Texas), and John Barrasso (R - Wyo) are S. J. Res. Introduced. 34. If two-thirds of the State Legislature approves, the state will be allowed to abolish federal laws and regulations

On Friday, "It is often ignored that policy makers tell them that they crossed over their borders and trampled their rights." "When you look at the policy issued by Washington, develop and comply with the responsibilities of Congress or certain agencies, it will fall to the state."

Senator said that this bill would give the state more power and "important federal inspections to expand".

The proposed amendment states: "Any legal or regulatory provision in the United States may be abolished by many countries, such cancellation may be avoided if two-thirds legislation of some states is used for this purpose "The same provisions or regulations as the regulation will be abolished."

In the Constitutional amendment, the possibility of solution is small, as two-thirds of the two parliaments either approve the bill or two-thirds of the state legislature need to approve through the Constitutional Conference.

Note that this approach should be taken into consideration when the federal government gets an unusual result as a result of the nature of state law, the location of the dispute, and the federal government reviewing state law rejection. The reason is obvious. "Because the outcome of this issue is related to the Federal Program, rules that do not fully comply with the plan do not apply." 49 Therefore, as the application of state law is appropriate, considering its impact on federal programs It must be. It will hinder the plan

There are federal law and state law in the United States. In the Federal Constitution, 50 states in the U.S. permit the enactment and enforcement of their own laws. Some of these laws are rarely executed, are weird, controversial and even annoying. Some of these laws are quirky and are rarely boringly destroyed by ordinary citizens, but some of the laws mentioned are very common, so violating the law without prior notice There are even. In Washington State, Sasquatch or other unknown species may be fined or imprisoned for harassment subjects. Scamaniya County, Washington State was a county that drafted the first bill in 1964, the state claimed that "willfully indiscriminately killing such creatures will be regarded as a felony." Washington's Whatcom County also passed this law on June 9 and announced that this county became a shelter for Sasquatch and Bigfoot.

We refuse federal law. Kentucky State and Virginia State established a precedent to prove the separation in the civil war of the South and North Korea by giving priority to the rights of the country rather than the rights of the federal government. According to the Incitation Method, is this an acceptable limit on freedom of speech or too far?

In addition to contradictions of slavery, many Southern states believe that state law should refuse federal law or central government law. These southern people do not want the federal government to interfere with their national affairs. They believe that the state reserves the right to refuse federal law they dislikes. The turning point was the 1860 presidential election. The Republican Party elected Abraham Lincoln as a presidential candidate. Lincoln is not an abolitionist, but he opposes the spread of slavery to the territory, which means South considers him to be an enemy. Leading Southerners announced that if Lincoln won the election they will ask to divide it into an alliance. Lincoln won the election on November 6, 1860, a month later, South Carolina left the United States. Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas leave the league after South Carolina. Civil war began