Remix Culture

One of the biggest problems caused by art of mixed culture is the question of "mixing and plagiarism". When did the remixed work become an original art work? When the work is adjusted, it is regarded as the original work. When the purpose or meaning of the work exceeds the original work, the work is also unique. Works like Montgomery Lee's "Copyright Symphony" capture various images and use them to create music that embeds data in the pictures. It is considered to be his own as he gives a new meaning to the image by summarizing the image.

Mixed culture, sometimes literacy culture is a society that makes it possible for derivative works to create and promote new creative works and products by combining and editing existing materials. By default, you can remix, modify, merge or otherwise remix the work of the copyright owner with Mix Culture. Artists in all fields of human history are common practice, but the growth of exclusive copyright restrictions over the past few decades has limited this practice. In response, professor Lawrence Lessig of Harvard believes that the ideal concept of human creativity is mixed, and since the beginning of the 21st century the concept of mixing has shifted to the digital age. Lessig founded Creative Commons in 2001. This issued a license as a tool to reactivate mixing culture, because the default proprietary copyright system currently used for intellectual property legally blocks the mix.

I think there is a difference between 'mixed culture' and 'split culture'. Mixing culture often increases culture and creativity and is expanded. On the other hand, pirate content illegal copying can deprive citizens of creative efforts and deprive the most talented creator of society to produce works that promote culture. Likewise, hacking, avoidance attacks, reverse engineering all play an important and legitimate role in our new digital economy, but for malicious purposes we do not need to accept the validity of these activities . Video game) illegal copy. )

The challenge of mixing culture is always a legal obstacle. On the one hand, there are people who think that everyone can get the culture, and they should be able to sample, mix and remix the work of others (open source documentary RiP !: a remix declaration Come to mind). There are various reasons for people who are opposed, from the way they want to hear and hear their music, to the problem of monetization. Regarding the latter question, it is good news that there are many people listening to music through licensing service, whether on YouTube, Soundcloud, or Apple Music. For example, Pac emaker knows exactly how many songs are used in a mix, and can notify Spotify when playing a song. With Mixcloud, users can upload tracking lists and time-stamp the mix and can pay to the rights holder accordingly.