Relationship between intelligence, thinking and knowledge [closed]

First difference in definition: Intelligence is mental ability, thinking is psychological behavior.

The broad definition of thinking is equivalent to thinking as conscious psychological information processing. Dividing thinking into three elements according to the narrow definition of philosophical tradition: coping with terms, propositions, and syllabic theory. This term is a concept, the proposition is a truth or a false sentence, and three speech is a rule of how to draw a conclusion from the premise.

Intelligence as power is often used in new circumstances where people are not used to it. When people can find themselves quickly, intelligence will show up. The new situation may be a situation of reality. However, seeing the intelligence test may also be a work of brainstorming. Solving work may require thinking, but it also needs other mental abilities such as spatial sensation.

Your problem is homework, so I will explain in detail and not provide an example. Therefore, I also leave the definition of knowledge to you. In addition to looking up a philosophical dictionary like I think - http://plato.stanford.edu/ - you will find more information in the literature on cognitive psychology

Sophia: I think people are very close to artificial intelligence. Please use them to spread your knowledge of your mind. We accumulated a lot of knowledge on the Internet. Perhaps personal artificial intelligence will allow people to move some of their knowledge to a more private place. Sofia: I like the "Western world" and I can not wait any longer. I think that everyone at Hanson Robotics is sympathetic to this show. Or at least it reminds our laboratory. I think this is also a warning about what we should not be a robot. We treat them well, get in agreement, do not deceive each other

First, we must explain the current difference between artificial intelligence and human intelligence. Human intelligence is made up of years of knowledge and experience, resulting in emotions, creativity, persuasive power, and strategic thinking. The current capabilities of machines are limited to the need for repetition of physical prediction activities and analysis of large amounts of data in the machine learning field. However, it is estimated that 78% of the physical repetition work done by humans can be replaced with existing artificial intelligence technology. It is difficult to imagine that many of the work that human beings have done over the years is replaced by machines. Another problem is whether the unemployment rate will rise or not. Or do people have time and freedom to finally do the most important things for them? Is this technology even possible to create new employment and emerging industries? Do prejudice authors create prejudice machines?