Reign of Terror Essay

Terror DBQ: Discuss the pros and cons of terrorism as a tool of the French Revolution

France experienced a major change in the summer of 1793, and Jacobin took over the moderate in the National Assembly. As the radical Jacobin ruled, the country got into turmoil, and the law of the suspects legalized the regional revolutionary committee and terrorism. As a result, thousands of people were killed by guillotine or other methods. Throughout the summer of 1793, the radical Jacobin faction established terrorism under the supervision of the Public Safety Commission.

Furthermore, in a public opinion report submitted to the government, he says, "Most of the citizens work well with the courts, they are committing innocence" (Reference 7). However, as this report is likely to support the ideals of the government, it seems that it is not true. Simply put, terror is good as it wipes out most of the opposite

They may have succeeded in curbing opposition in France to some extent, but the Revolutionary Army succeeded in establishing more enemies to solve future conflicts. Desmoulins in Document 6 asks, "If you do not make 10 enemies for your family and friends, can you let people die with a foothold?" It is impossible for Des Moulins to kill him in the process without making an enemy from his affiliation. Simply stated, the Army believes that their belief in moving toward a common interest is denied by the fact that they have killed numerous French citizens. Public opinion on this issue included 'painful complaints repeatedly expressed' (Document 10). This is a big disadvantage as the Army establishes mutual disdain for the revolutionary government. Without government support, it is difficult to prosper.

The timing and cause of the start of the terror rule is a matter of historical discussion. Depending on historians, the rule of terror began when Louis XVI was executed in January 1793. Others distinguished it from the establishment of the revolutionary court (March 1793), the forced repatriation of representatives of the Gillentine from the National Assembly (June 1793), or the murder of Jean-Paul Marat (July 1793) did. If the rule of terrorism has the beginning of legislation, that is, on September 5, 1793, the representative of Montagnard at the Diet announced his understanding of anti-revolutionary terrorism. Jacobin and members of the Public Safety Commission Bertrand Bailele summarized what he needed in the speech: "Fear is the order of the day. How is this eliminated soon? Wish, well, they should have a blood of conspirators such as Brissot and Marie Antoinette.

The result is the rule of terrorism. Among them, Marie Antoinette lost his reason. Literally through the guillotine. It was not made to promote the spread of terrorism to the French ruling class and the aristocratic domination of barbarirous tools which it can not understand. Most of them are on their way to exile. For other things, the proverb "I will move my heart on the street" was born in the process of their execution. Lead their heads to roll through the city of Paris

Domination of terror has ended many important lives. Among the terrorists, more prominent victims are the former Queen Marie Antoinette, Jack Blissso of the dilone speaker, former ex-Jacobin Leader Antoine Banabe, the first mayor of Paris Jean-Sylvain Bai, a famous woman. Revolutionary Mrs Rowland and Olympic Degus; ex-mistress of Louis XV, Mrs. Barry; Charlotte Cody, Assassin of Jean-Paul Marat; Philippe Égalité, Duke of former Olympus, Defense Attorney of the Rebel King Guillaume Malesherbes. Antoine Lavoisier, one of the most famous scientists in France, Jacques Ebert, the radical leader of Culotte, Camille Decemurin, a journalist, and George Denton, a political leader of the populist. However, the victims of most terrorism still have no face and are not known by history. Some are priests, aristocrats, conspirators, and defenders of the former regime - but most are members of tertiary industries.