Reflection of the argument "Learning by Degree"

In this discussion, Rebecca Mead discusses some of the benefits of college admission. She raises examples of high degrees of employment and salary. For example, college students majoring in business have about 50% the chance of getting a job after graduation. Students majoring in economics get high compensation even when they get a job. An average of $ 50,000 per year, which will increase up to $ 100,000 over time.

Frederica Evans 2 Hour Degree Rhetorical Analysis Summary: In Rebecca Mead's article "Learning Degrees", both aspects of the discussion are of monetary value. Rebecca will tell you about the merits of going on to university. For example, some grades are very good, the adoption rate is high. For example, a college student who has a degree in business has a 44% chance of turning it into an appropriate job.

At a very basic level, the discussion is done in some way under conditions that reflect the "Biblical Perspective" and we will not be responsible for the content of the discussion of people. If the providers of these discussions are aware of this, it is fair to point out that they are making intellectual dishonesty. So how to avoid it? Assuming that you truly believe what you say, it is wisdom of integrity to say your own understanding. Whether this view can be considered persuasive and whether it can be successfully defended through rational arguments. Repetition of understanding clarified by the council or theologian when quoting citation can also be intelligent and honest. Whether these views are considered persuasive will change the quality of the discussion they present. Council and theologians may be wrong

Why do we have to discuss? In many cases, persuasive opponents, consensus on opinions, proof of knowledge, etc. are mentioned as arguments. However, discussion can also be used to stimulate reflection on their own reasoning. The cognitive function of this discussion is worth studying as it is important to improve people's arguments and reasoning, learning process, dealing with "evil problems", and conflict resolution. This contribution develops the first step in the theory of refuted argument. It provides a definition of introspective discussion, proves its importance, explains it as a new cognitive function classification as another cognitive function of the discussion, and discusses to stimulate reflection on his own reasoning Will be discussed.