Reason to Oppose the Proposition 19

Proposition 19 was a new initiative in the California state vote on November 2, 2010 for regulating and taxing cannabis. There are many reasons to question this claim. Firstly, at the state or federal level, we can not find enough systems to prevent cannabis from spreading to minors. Secondly, modern drivers divert a lot of attention that may affect driving, such as alcohol and telephone conversations, browsing the internet, sending text messages, etc. The government does not need to allow marijuana. Marijuana may have even more dangerous effects on the driver.

In November 2010, a California state voter dismissed Proposition 19 (voting rate 53.5% to 46.5%), allowing adults aged 21 and older to use cannabis, legalize and grow, and sales It was prescribed the same. Alcohol This initiative was strongly opposed by many police organizations within the state, and many producers of the Jade triangle were strongly opposed by the fears of corporate giant farms to bankrupt them. The adoption of Senate bill 1449 also weakened the initiative one month before the election. Proposition 19 is led by Richard Lee, founder of Oakston University.

Bruce objected to proposal 92.3 of California election. The proposal will impose a tax of 50 cents / cup on coffee to cover educational expenses. According to a recent opinion poll, 57% of candidate voters support this proposal. Bruce then paid an advertisement that explained that if the proposal was passed, the cost of a cup of coffee will increase by 50 cents. After the advertisement poll showed that only 32% of the potential voters are supporting the proposal. Is this an example of advertisement effect (n) ___________ test?

Note: In some cases, the committee is registered to support or oppose multiple proposals. On the ballot form, the total number of all the committees registered to support or oppose each proposal is listed. This means that the sum of all donations in the figure below is more than the total donation. In California, 66 civil led measures were submitted for voting in 2018. This was less than the number of votes in 2016 and 2014. The number of people voted in 2016 was 135, of whom 15 (11%) voted. The number of people who applied for voting in 2014 was 82, four of them (5%) were eligible for voting. If the percentage of certification in 2018 is the same (5% to 11%), 3 to 7 voting plans will be shown in the poll.