Reason and Irrationality in King Lear

"Rear king rationality and irrationality" in Shakespeare's "King of the Lears" deals with the problem of rationality and irrationality by comparing Reagan and Gonier's Machiavelli tactics with Gloucester's Edgar. Compare the experience of Leah and Cordelia. By doing so, he published a very deep statement about the essence of human existence - he accused rationality and natural order, promoting the most absurd things in the world, human love. From the text, I am confident that Shakespeare believes that everyone needs to live in an unfair world, ie love.

Rationality of madness, reasonable madness; This double paradox is reflected in the Shakespearean play "Kingrya" and shows the collapse of the king and the big family. The rear family and the kingdom were torn apart and showed parallelism as soon as there were conflicts. If someone who is not suitable for leadership gains power, confusion will occur. That is exactly what happens in the drama. Again, this paradox explains how sensible characters and crazy characters behave like madly behaving. King Lear is a perfect example of how this double paradox applies. Before he got angry, he gave up Kent and Cordelia, but during his wise fail he saw how to make a mistake and became a king and a father.

Shakespeare is a perfect teacher. Through Macbeth, King Lear, Hamlet, Shakespeare teaches madness as a devastating threat to identity. Crazy changed Macbeth, defining King Lear and destroying Ophelia. Crazy represents absurdity, confusion, stupidity. As feminist criticism insists, women are not positively influenced by madness, but insanity has always proven to be destructive. Crazy is not just a state of mind. Shakespeare plays crazy as a channel of communication course and warns about the devastating effect that madness gives to identity

Dear Kent, the faithful subject of King Lear is absurdity of the soul being bothered by Lear very much. King Lear could not resist someone who told him at this point that he was wrong. Kent seems to be attributed to Lia's anger and spiritual deterioration. Kent opposed Leah when he decided to expel Cordelia, so Leah thought it was a direct act against him, even accusing him that he chose his life and is rebellious did. Of course, this is unfounded. Because Kent only wants to prove to Leah that he abandons some precious things. Leah chose to consider this a betrayal, and Kent decided that he was not loyal to him, probably never loyal.