The basic idea of democracy is the government governed by the people. However, the democratic implementation of each country is different, which depends on historical factors and cultural factors of each country. Pakistan, Egypt and Indonesia are Muslim dominant countries and prove their ability to maintain a democratic system. Based on this fact, my hypothesis is that Muslim countries are compatible with democracy as long as their Islamic values are still respected by the West. In the future, if the two sides maintain a deep mutual understanding relationship, intense conflict between Western countries and Muslim countries can be avoided.
In his famous "Clash of Civilizations" article in 1993, Samuel Huntington wrote that "the fault line between civilizations will be at the forefront of the future" and the gap between Islam and the West is most prominent It is one of things. . Many supporters of Donald Trump propose this view frantically, but the cards themselves are not (although he is obviously not a Muslim friend). By establishing a coalition of fossil fuels including Islamic countries, cards hope to strengthen the power of professional carbon power on a global scale. Ironically, the strange effect he has so far weakened the power of any early Green Alliance so far has produced a boomlang effect. It is pioneering and entrenched. In this sense, he seems to create self-contained prophecies more closely by promoting environmentally friendly countries.
US politics and cards were elected as Pots, British Burgit, the financial crisis within the EU, international trade cooperation, Syrian civil war, Islam and the West, relations with Islamic states and terror, police violence and fear. These are some of the questions we are interested in 2016. I believe that understanding the present and predicting the future can only be predicted by understanding the past. I do not think that I am a religious person, but I believe that religion, especially Christianity, can teach us a lot about our world. I have to say that this is probably the most difficult book I have ever read; it may be compared with "creative evolution" of Henri Bergson (1907). This is one of those texts that may change your life. Here, Gillard talked with two psychiatrists J. M. Oughourlian and G. Defort to discuss his philosophical thinking, especially "imitation theory".