Real Marriage

Genuine marriage Catholic church refuses homosexual acts, but accuses prejudice against homosexuals Vincent Foy says that homosexuality in the past was called "serious moral evil, death and hell" I will prove (3). However, in today's society, homosexuality is starting to be accepted as a state of normal and natural human beings. Therefore, it is wrong to treat homosexuals with rude and hateful. Nevertheless, gay marriage should not be legalized as it will damage and change the essence of marriage.

Marriage is fundamental, traditionally done among heterosexual members. Since most societies believe that marriage is a coalition between men and women, this argument is one of the most powerful uses. Homosexuals need real marriage, they do not require special forms of marriage or relationships reserved only for homosexual couples. Homosexual couples can not have children. This is not one of the most commonly used parameters for several reasons. Society does not expect people who are trying to get married to have children and to show that they have children. Heterosexuals can give birth to a child with medical assistance and homosexual couples can use the same method. Heterosexuals who are not allowed to have children can get married. Homosexuals can adopt children, so there are more homosexual couples. There are many other ways of viewing, but even after the review people are still confident in this perspective strongly.

It is difficult for me to define what constitutes a "real" marriage, but it seems that everyone else has figured it out. Some people try to establish a family by defining marriage as an alliance between men and women. However, not all married couple who decided to marry in a "public and legitimate" way wants children - are not their marriages a "real" marriage? Also, some couples marrying in a "public and legitimate" way can not have their own family, or "do not want to make a family" and / or do not want to raise funds. Will this reduce their marriage somewhat? Even if a free couple that seems to have no children has the same respect as ours with children, I certainly do not like that.

Arranging for marriage is a very "real" marriage. In the history of mankind, more marriages will be defined by any wise arrangement. More importantly, an exceptionally small number of arranged marriages actually divorced. If you want to make this distinction you should pay more attention to whether or not pop star marriage is a "real" marriage. Even more seriously, millions of people are married for "wrong" reasons. Economic safety, desire for children, pressure from parents, and lack of choice among potential partners. This is pure romanticism, arguing that marriage should be a match of love, and should be halted. This is only to show that it is impossible to reasonably distinguish the established marriage and it is unrealistic to try to prohibit marriage.