Questions and Answers: Associationistic Theory of Learning

Joint definition and explanation of the meaning of collaborative learning theory (1/2 point) Understand the theory of associative theory and understand the meaning of it. Associationism is a "psychological school that believes that the content of consciousness can be explained by the connection and recombination of discreet emotions and sensory elements" ("Associationistic", 2014). Therefore, the idea of ​​all unified theories is that there are several possible associations that can lead to learning.

In the Lenovo paradigm, theorists try to explain the learning process according to the relevance of the principles of similarity, contrast, adjacency, and frequency. The main view of the three theorists is that associationists are Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, Edwin Ray Guthrie, William Kay Estes. The main theoretical concept of Ivan Pavlov's classic condition highlights continuity. Hergenhahn and Olson (2005) describes the classical state as "an experimental arrangement in which the stimulus can cause a previously associated reaction" (p. 465). Analysis of Pavlov's classical adjustment concluded that when the conditional stimulus preceded the unconditional stimulus, it ultimately caused a conditioned response. Pavlov also pointed out that there must be uncontrolled stimulation to avoid extinction

The second joint rationalist is Edwin Regis. Some of the major theoretical concepts of Guthrie include neighbor approach, first instance learning, and new principle. According to Hergenhahn and Olson (2005), the neighboring law of Guthrie is mainly concerned, "Combinations of stimuli with exercise tends to follow exercise as exercise recurs" (p.212). In his one - time learning principle, when a stimulus is paired with a response, the association between the two is done on the first trial. Hergenhahn and Olson (2005) generalizes Guthrie's "Recommendability Principles" as "anything we do in certain circumstances", and if these happen again we will act again "(p. 213 )

The second criticism of early thought work is theoretical. The philosopher's unity theory contradicts some of the results of the Würzburg group, but early psychologists did not propose real options, Seltz's theory was ambiguous. The conflict between Unionism theory and Seltz's previous study of Gestalt has not been solved yet, but many current theories like information processing may be considered a compromise. Finally, I left a question of legality. There is new interest in cognitive psychology, but there are still some problems in thinking and complex learning in psychology. Finally, we can answer in the laboratory whether we can investigate how human thinking works.