This article analyzes and explores the ethics of positive behavior. First, to make it easier for readers to understand the contents of this article, we will briefly explain the issues under discussion. In addition to this interpretation, I will also explain the relevance to the business world. In addition, in this article we will consider ethical issues from the viewpoint of resultualism and non-resultantism. These two views will be explained by taking Mill's Utilitarianism as an example of the former and Kant's absolute order as an example of the latter.
Positive behaviors are defined by Webster's New World University Dictionary as "policies or plans to correct discrimination effects in employment or education of specific group members". President John F. Kennedy issued Presidential Decree No. 10925 in 1961, the President's Employment Equal Opportunity Committee was established and called the "affirmative action". In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson issued Presidential Decree 11246. The order requires a federal contractor
President John F. Kennedy and President Lyndon Johnson first proposed a positive action. Since Kennedy and Johnson, positive action has been severely distorted. Both presidents will adopt this policy to stop discrimination rather than just reversing discrimination. As time goes by, we will find alternatives to aggressive behavior.
Aggressive litigation has been subject to intense debate since the execution of active litigation in the United States in 1965. Aggressive action aimed at addressing social inequality in the United States is a series of programs and policies aimed at providing women and ethnic minorities with opportunities for more education and employment markets. Therefore positive acts have been opposed, mainly to white men in blue collar who believe this will harm their best interests. In positive action, families of generations had unfair laws and prejudices to hinder the growth of minorities. Slavery, apartheid, separate but equivalent laws, traces of tears, failure of ESOL courses, salary inequalities, and great influence on today's youth, and, if any, historical change. Positive behavior has good intentions, which is very needed in today's world, but sometimes it can not be created. Additional scores