Quantitative Article Critique

My article on Lykeridou, Gourounti, Deltsidou, Lautradis, and Vaslamatzis (2009) is to examine the overall stress related to the degree of depression, anxiety, and infertility of women undergoing fertility treatment. It is speculated that the cause of infertility diagnosis affects psychological vulnerability of women. The variables observed in this study were infertility diagnosis and psychological impairment. The diagnostic levels of infertility used in this study were male factor infertility, female factor infertility, mixed type and idiopathic infertility.

An article under criticism was published in 2013 in quantitative research entitled "Related factors in academic success of nursing students: descriptive related research". We criticize this article based on the guidelines provided. The research title of interest is clear, capturing phenomena with population and interest. In addition, the summary is structured and provides information in various headlines. Because the lack of care for caregivers and the quality of care pose a threat to the health industry, the issues described are very important to care.

The weaknesses and advantages of this white paper are based on qualitative and quantitative research quality principles. (Burns and Grove, 2007 p. 445), this paper will give intellectual criticism. Critique of intellectual research includes a thorough investigation of research conducted to determine its weaknesses, strengths, meanings, meanings, and logical connections. In this article we apply all five qualitative criteria and four quantitative critical research stages. We pay close attention to article consistency, consistency and ease of use. In this article we will conduct a detailed investigation of these two materials to help infer evidence-based nursing field changes.

This was published by British Journal of Nursing in 2011 in a review of quantitative research paper "Patient Prognostic Evaluation: Pressure Uptake Prevention Mattress" by Linda Roughter. Criticism is "Balanced evaluation of criticism and research report" (Polit & Beck, 2010), which studies the pros and cons of this article and the importance and importance of this study for prevention of pressure ulcers (Burns & Grove, 2011). According to Burns and Grove (2011, p. 55), the abstract usually includes "research purpose, design, setting, number of samples, main results and conclusions." In this article, the author explained the equipment used and clearly analyzed the results. However, the authors did not mention the design and purpose of the research, and the location of the study. Parahoo and Reid said the recommendation should also be introduced in the summary (Ingham - Broomfield, 2008)