Several scholars say that you can not grasp the meaning of text by calculating the number of times you painted violence or the type of work specified in the story.
This view points out that much of the meaning of the story is based on the knowledge that the reader or viewer brings to the text.
You must understand the idea used by readers / readers to interpret the text to study its meaning.
Due to the unique perspectives and expertise of researchers, analysis and conclusions will also be unique.
Other people will get different conclusions about the text analysis of the movie and so on.
The important thing is not to analyze the text with one correct analysis, but to provide a thoughtful and insightful reading to help the audience see the text in a new and valuable way.
Make media consumers understand the meaning of text and understand better
Researchers are trying to identify and distinguish the meaning of the whole text and important features of the text, not "coding" (assigning numbers to sample units).
Analysts will examine the text in terms of theory or theory used to evaluate the text.
Qualitative analysis allows detailed evaluation of the text, but it also leaves the possibility of a special interpretation.
Pull, which was previously anticipated, may deviate from interpretation of text - even among scholars committed to "subjectivity".
Output is a theoretical text description based on one or more notice analysis, not a series of tables or graphs showing the number of times a particular function or category was identified.
The goal is to better understand the meaning of the text and the impact that a particular function has on its meaning.
Sometimes, the most powerful analysis is a combination of quantitative evaluation (content analysis) and qualitative evaluation (text analysis) of text.
Traditionally, qualitative methods of text analysis rely on descriptive interpretive format analysis, which can be intentionally extended to discourse analysis. Explicit interpretation research is attempting to "reconstruct hidden rules and share experiences and collective knowledge of social actors" (Angermüller, 2005, p. 4). An analysis of explanation interpretation centered on actors as meaningful producers conforms to the general purpose of Ricoh's agent-centered interpretive science, capturing both the intention of text production and its social background I will. Interpretation Interpretation research recognizes that discourse is a hyper-independent structure that supports and constrains human agents, but there is a tendency to focus on personal agents in meaning creation in analysis. Alvesson and Kärreman, 2000, p. 1132)
Qualitative analysis is analysis of qualitative data such as text data of interview recording. Unlike quantitative analysis, quantitative analysis is statistically driven, independent mainly from researchers, and qualitative analysis mainly concerns the analytical and comprehensive skills of researchers and the social background from which data is collected It depends on personal knowledge. The focus of qualitative analysis is to "manufacture" or understand phenomena, rather than predicting or interpreting phenomena. Based on ethical awareness and participatory contextual attitudes and a range of analytical strategies, qualitative analysis requires creative and researching thought. In this chapter we will briefly explain some of these qualitative analysis strategies. For innovative work on this topic, please refer to more authoritative detailed references such as Miles and Huberman (1984) 17.
Social science research: principle, method, and practice Anol Bhattacherjee University of South Florida, abhatt @ usf.edu