Qualitative research includes ways to enable researchers to explore problems to gather unknown data to contribute to scientific theory. In addition, this research method allows researchers to fully study the basics related to research problems. Data collection for this research method includes detailed interviews and observations in the natural environment. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyze two qualitative research papers and to further improve the relevant fields of my research topics.
Chaotic analysis and induction method Qualitative research analysis is sure to cause confusion. The analysis of the qualitative data does not obey the straight line that points to the "B" point, but rather the multistage involved process built on itself until a meaningful verifiable interpretation is achieved . . In qualitative research, researchers need to accept data entanglement from many sources, due to mutual related confusion, contradiction, and seemingly non-logical inputs. An important reason for "confusion" of the analysis process is induction. Qualitative researchers analyze the results inside out and organize and derive meaning through the data itself from the data.
Qualitative analysis is analysis of qualitative data such as text data from interview records. Unlike quantitative analysis, quantitative analysis is driven statistically and is mainly independent of researchers. Qualitative analysis mainly consists of researcher analysis and comprehensive skills, and the social background from which data is collected It depends on personal knowledge. Qualitative analysis focuses on "manufacturing" or understanding phenomena, rather than predicting or interpreting phenomena. Qualitative analysis requires ethical enlightenment and attitude in the context of participants and creative and researching thinking based on a series of analytical strategies. In this chapter we will briefly explain some of these qualitative analysis strategies. Interested readers can refer to more authoritative and detailed references like Miles and Huberman (1984) 17 for innovative work on this subject.
Social science research: principle, method and practice Anol Bhattacherjee University of South Florida, abhatt @ usf.edu