Publishing the same study twice - an acceptable practice?

*) I think that it is not easy to rephrase a sentence (people can not expect to do this). When you read the same author's paper, there are some similarities to that style. But when it comes to all 300 words, it is slightly different

*) The spread of research is very important - I also support Sandro's idea that people may want to present something to the two audiences. However, in this case, the author made it public in the same field as the journal.

"It takes a lot of labor and I want to write the same theme to multiple publications in my own way. It is much easier to cut and paste from the initial work. Most authors know the ban very well Self replication may not be so obvious, it is equally a serious violation that affects the author 's career and academic status as well, and it is also a serious breach, and it is also a law to steal others and write your own materials There is a good reason.The author has to transfer the copyright to the publisher of the magazine, but it is illegal to transfer the copyright of the same material to multiple magazines and publishers. Legal Problem Secondly, it is immoral to present works as second-public in the original, from an academic point of view, human reference has been extended with multiple versions of the same material.Sharvest, often Spirit reviews, no peer-reviewed, and often significant abuse, which is sponsored by commercial interests may be a very wide range, as shown in this incident, it increases the likelihood of self-plagiarism. "

Blogger says, "Replication is also questionable for those writing reviews about the work of other people." For meta-analysis: the same experiment is calculated two more times if it is separately released The importance of many research findings may not be so important. "

Here are two ways to deal with the problem. One thing is whether consumers will accept the "printing" publishing industry, which seeks the same approach the music industry is trying to establish. But the other is that the publishing industry will pursue these practices and follow the development of the music industry. I think there are several reasons that this is not going to happen, and the publishing industry respects the importance of management culture and knowledge records, and the exchange of ideas and thinking and cross-border flows and readers It will ensure freedom. Perhaps the publishing industry will set the standards followed by other industries.

Ironically in the music world, music publishers are always searching for great songs, but at the same time, most major music publishers have policies that do not accept unsolicited material . As a future composer, this seems to be confusing at least, and it seems to be frustrating even worse. I asked why most publishers would not accept the initiative to publish materials provided by John Ozier, creative vice president. John's answer is clear, but also provides songwriters the information they need to tell what they can do to avoid this seemingly impossible situation.