Public health, ethics, and equity

Research on health and health care inequality is a complex subject of science. Many different scientific disciplines, including epidemiology, social science, and moral philosophy currently defined as "ethics" have made important contributions. This book presents the current major philosophical theory on unfair inequality between individual members and subgroups of society, including John Roll's justice theory and Amartya Sen's capacity theory It is a good primer to. Discussion and bibliography The book also shows the relevance of these theories to health inequality research and health policy development habits through many practical and practical examples.

This book starts with a series of lectures at seminars and seminars in the late 1990s and includes five main sections. The theme of this book and the nature of multiple authors is one of its strengths because it allows you to intensively or selectively read a paper written by a group of highly respected authors, but it is necessarily different It is also the biggest weakness in terms. The reader will notice that the overall relevance and quality of the articles may differ from the various contributors.

As a reader of this sort, I am particularly fascinated with essays exploring the quest for moral defense issues (or in some cases missing moral defense) and healthy personal responsibility and the degree of social responsibility for health I will. A subgroup of ethnically defined population. Instead, I am disappointed with the moral discourse related to ethics of resource allocation in health care. In particular, the contents provided are ethical criticisms of indicators such as birth date after the disability adjustment and birth date after quality adjustment, are generally far away, close to the principle of liberalism I found out that. Health outcome indicators such as resource allocation, including time preference (discount) is certainly encouraging preventive measures, not therapeutic intervention, they are still in the process of dealing with privileges and vulnerable people You can use inequality between and.

I thought that this book is more unfair about health (rather than medical care). Differences between developed countries such as global (like HIV / AIDS) health status, health care (eg preventive medicine, new expensive medical technology, etc.) than the possibility of unfair inequality due to health determinants As a main source of information. Nevertheless, this is rather a rather broad criticism of the "new public health" paradigm than the book itself, more criticism, this paradigm is precisely this discourse, mainly ignoring medical treatment and reflecting the current discourse The role of inequality in health care is an important contributor to overall health. Injustice

Overall, this book will make reading more interesting, helping to improve our understanding of the philosophical theory of inequality between wider public health workers and what public interest.

CONCLUSION The general public generally clarifies the important fairness and ethical considerations to support living donors and to protect the health and safety of living donors. This will increase public participation and help strengthen the common view of experts and the public on the practices and policies of life contributions. so. This study was planned, systematically reviewed, and integrated, and this paper was drafted. J.R.C. participated in the design of research and review, provided content expertise, and reviewed articles. G. W. participated in the design of the research, gathered data, analyzed, and contributed to the writing of the article. M.A.J. helps studying and writing the design of articles. J.C.C. participated in the design of research and data analysis and contributed to the writing of this article. so. Guarantor

In public health decisions, the goal of 0.16 public health is to achieve community health, if not violating the rights of individuals, the public of the complex, legal, social and personal point of view There is no clear ethical framework for dealing with hygiene problems. People living in the community, and respect for different community values, beliefs and culture 0.17 Therefore, decision-making and policy-level interventions made during the design and implementation process should be consistent with "good" moral principles. "" Do not harm "" Fair "" Respect "Empowerment" "Sustainability" "Social responsibility" "Participation" "Open" and "Account responsibility". However, not all these ethical principles can be solved in a single way. Therefore, the moral dilemma is more appropriate for the sensitive problem of crackling sex trade.