In many religions, the use of clothing such as the Jewish Dome or Islamic scarf is not only for choice but also for strict rituals or religious obligations. Wearing traditional costumes is not only considered a religious obligation, it is closely related to spiritual practice. What is widely used indicates that it is an integral part of the continuity of multiple religious activities. When religious clothes are based on expressions of central religious beliefs, the extent to which the country can hinder this freedom of expression.
Religion is part of your identity and you can not ask someone to leave a part of their identity in the house. It is like asking someone not to get dark in public. This is impossible! The question is to guarantee that modern European society can live peacefully regardless of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious belief, etc.
The display of religious symbols in public places has caused controversy in many countries. The authors of this study investigated the attitudes in displaying religious symbols in public places, especially religious, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), social identity, and the psychological of potential mediating effects of positive and negative emotions Predictive factors were studied. 330 Polish studies suggest that the support of the exclusive exhibition of Christian crosses in the public places of Poland is positively predicted through religious, RWA and religious identity rather than Polish national identity Respectively. These relationships are regulated by the feelings experienced when seeing the cross. In addition, it was found that those with high RWA support the display of the cross regardless of religious level, while those with low RWA only support the display of the cross at the height of religious beliefs It was.