Psychological Safety: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Extension

Despite the active development of psychological security research in recent years, the important role of psychological security in the workplace has been empirically supported, but there are still some important issues. In order to address these problems, we summarized theoretical and empirical studies and compared 13,000 independent samples representing more than 22,000 individuals and about 5000 groups to comprehensive meta-cause of psychological safety and consequences Analysis was carried out. In addition to proposing a legal network of psychological safety, we extended our research in four important ways. First, we compare the magnitude of the impact and determine the relative effectiveness of the cause and the effect on mental safety. Next, I examined not only the relevant concepts such as positive leadership relationships and recruitment information, but also how much psychological safety affects task performance and organizational citizen activity. Third, we investigate the characteristics of research design and whether domestic culture has changed the effectiveness of the legal network, thereby promoting a more accurate and contextual understanding of psychological safety. Finally, the homology hypothesis was verified by comparing the magnitude of the influence of the individual and group analysis levels and the effect of psychological safety outcomes. Finally, we discussed the areas that we need to examine in the future.

Meta-analysis is a combination of individual research results that yield quantitative literature review, another methodological innovation that is closely related to psychology of education. In meta-analysis, for example, the magnitude of the effect representing differences between treatment groups in a series of similar experiments is averaged to obtain a single summation value representing the best estimate of the therapeutic effect. Decades of meta-analysis Glass in the early version of Pearson released the first application of the latest meta-analysis technology and stimulated their widespread use in social science and biomedical science. Today, the meta-analysis is the most common literature review in educational psychology research.

This guide is based on extensive review of medical, psychological, and educational literature. The purpose of literature review is to determine the long-term and short-term efficacy and safety of ADHD drugs and non-pharmacological interventions in children aged 6 to 12 years and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy (eg drug alone) and combination therapy management strategy It is to compare. Comments based on two systematic evidences are widely used to create this guide 2, 4 In addition, we gathered more information using other resources 6, 7

Clinical guide: Treatment of school-age children with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder

It is an abstraction. In this study, we investigated the effects of psychotherapy on children and adolescents who received sexual abuse through a meta-analysis. Thirty papers met selection criteria, and the meta-analysis database with this group as an analysis unit consisted of 44 treatment groups and 7 control groups. The effector index is a standardized average change between the mean before and after the test and it is a measure of various results (sexual behavior, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, behavior problems, other results) and evaluation method (Child) self-declaration. Parent Reports and Clinician Evaluation For all outcome measures, the mean effect size of the treatment group was statistically and clinically significant, while the control group did not achieve a significant improvement.