Psychological Egoism Theory

The theory of psychological self-interest is certainly reasonable. In the context of this paper, the reasonable meaning refers to the validity or imagination of the theory to explain the nature and motivation of human behavior (Hinman, 2007). Satisfaction gained after they completed the tasks they participated in the stimulated human behavior. For example, Mother Theresa is satisfied with the goodwill and activities he did through his life. As Hinman (2007) pointed out, she may reduce her activities if she complains about her efforts.

However, moral egoism refers to this phenomenon in a completely different way from psychological egoism. And psychological egoism is descriptive theory (people insist on acting in some way), moral self-interest is a normative theory (people insist that they should act in some way). People are not psychological egosists, they may become moral egoists. The problem with this argument is that it contradicts the central idea of ​​moral egoism and ultimately depends on the principle of mercy rather than the principle of true self-interest. In other words, it only supports moral self-interest as a strategy for pursuing other values ​​- clearly general welfare; it does not support moral self-interest as a fundamental principle of morality.

Psychological egoism is the idea that everyone is always selfish. It expresses human nature as completely self-centered and self-motivated. Psychological self-interest differs from their "fit" and moral self-interest in the world. Psychological egoism is the theory of fact. It is designed to adapt to the world. In the world, it is not psychological self to say that psychological egoism is a problem because someone is not acting selfishly. In my opinion, this argument is completely wrong.

The theory of descriptive egoist is called "psychological self-interest". Psychological egoism is expressed as being completely self-centered and self-motivating human nature. An example of this human interpretation precedes the formation of the theory and can be seen in the work of Thomas Hobbs, a British Victorian historian and Thomas Hobbs, a British religious reform philosopher. In response to this question, "Is the proposition of respecting humanity absolute and universal?" Macquarie replied, "We only know one thing ... People always start with their own interests "(Quoting Gavin) In Leviathan, Hobbs says," No one gives, but it is intended for good. Since gifts are voluntary, in all voluntary actions, everyone's goal is their own pleasure There is. "