Psychological Approach in Analyzing the Implication of Violent Cartoons

Over the past 80 years children have often been welcomed by animated films and TV programs. Beginning in the early 1920s, Felix Cat was the first manga icon. After that, the roles of Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck and Pluto at Disney Brothers Cartoon Studio in the 1930 's continued (Hassen and Daniyal, 2013). Along this, the cartoon program has proved to be the most part of every child's life. On the other hand, many theories have been drawing attention on the history of cartoon programs that children are most concerned about.

Children's programs are particularly violent. Watching cartoons on Saturday morning was once a common aspect of American life. Now the web keeps having manga. Studies that analyzed popular cartoon content have 20 to 25 violent behaviors in an hour and are about six times the prime time program23. Overall, 46% of TV violence is in cartoons 20, 21, 22. These plans are likely to combine violence and humor (67%) and are unlikely to show long-term effects of violence (5%) 21, 22, 23, 24. Manga violence does not damage, increasing the possibility of youths' offensive and antisocial behavior 24. This makes sense because difficulties in child development can distinguish reality from dreams.

Research on adult's perception of humor comics is consistent. Howitt and Cumberbatch (1975) discovered that most adults do not consider humorous cartoons violent. Similarly, Gunter and Furnham (1984) found that the violence depicted in humorous cartoons is not considered to be as violent as the actual actor. Given the contradiction in the use of children's research and lack of research, further research is needed to determine the development of violent cognition in the development of comedy and non-comedy comics. There is no evidence that children consider humorous cartoons to be less violent than other forms of media, but there is a theoretical reason to believe that comedies actually hide or despise violent depictions .