Prufrock and Modernist notion of trivial things completeing themselves

Modern humans are in a series of unimportant pursuits that seems to make their lives even shallower. Eliot shows that the only reason to take simple action using "Prufrock" is to avoid big problems. This is as simple as asking a woman, it may be as complex as faced with death. Anyway, J. Alfred Prufrock avoids all challenging things in life. His purpose is to avoid death. Because he does not know how to deal with death. He avoids asking women to go out as he is afraid of what she says.

Elliot tells the story of Pulfock using the flow of consciousness developed by his modernist writer. This poem is a dramatic internal monologue of urban men who feel that they can not take decisive action isolated. Prufrock mourns his physical and intellectual inertia, the loss of opportunity of life, and the lack of spiritual progress.

With the advent of Elliot and his poem "Alfred Pulfock's Love Song", the romantic idealism of the 19th century was broken and the paradigm turned into a more modern classic. So what is the normative modernist response in the love song of Alfred Prufrock? This is actually the climax of the influence that Dante gave to Elliott, where he realized a poem including a wonderful philosophical quest that is different from a romantic poet. Regarding the nature that Elliot has borrowed from Dante, "Alfred Pulfock's Love Song" reveals a close relationship between the two, but there is evidence that it is not. There is evidence that Eliot seems to be planning to use Prufrock as a representative of Dante's Inferno. To demonstrate the close relationship between Inferno and Prufrock, take an epigraph as an example.