Since the Internet did not have academic papers in the academic field in the 1990s, there was a thorough discussion on Internet and comments on whether individuals should restrict their comments. Furthermore, due to popularity of emerging social networks such as Facebook and Twitter in recent years, this is getting more and more attention. Some claim that everyone has the right to opinion and freedom of expression, but some believe there may be a chaotic anarchy situation due to freedom of speech.
Now do not think I do not believe in freedom of speech. This is the purpose of this blog. Freedom of speech searches the Internet for vacancy pros and cons, protests protests by corrupt politicians, roar bad drivers and allow racist remarks about American Mexican rapists. That said, which is not the most important? Everything is worth it. I value my life, partner's life, student life and so on. When I asked about his life, I value James, a homeless man who spoke to me for half an hour this summer. This is very insightful. If I say that I also treasure my partner and James, I will lie. I did not invite James to my house every night. I am saying that you valued everyone in your life. This is Communism!
The fourth article on this blog will explain the pros and cons of free and anonymous speech on the Internet. While emphasizing the value of online anonymity, I am trying to understand the concerns of consumers' anonymous posting. In this article, we also disclose our own perspective on the value of information literacy by presenting research papers pointing out the necessity of information literacy to make it possible to practice freedom of speech.
Who needs to manage information flowing over the Internet? This is the center of discussion about the strengths and weaknesses of net neutrality. On one side of this equation, the idea that you can enjoy the freedom of speech and participate in the innovation process rather than impose unreasonable restrictions on the use of the Internet is an attractive reason to support the neutrality of the network. Without net neutrality, people who provide services so that consumers can access the Internet have more control. They may impose severe restrictions on the use of the Internet, restrict individual users, or charge a large service charge so that only a few rich people can access the Internet.