Prime principle believes that the meaning of the constitution is determined at the time of printing. Therefore, when applying questions about the Constitution, the correct behavioral policy is to determine the meaning of the sentence and apply it to the current issue. People who are supporters of primitiveism, the purpose of enacting the written constitution is to "give certain fundamental rights so that they can win at the moment of passion when fanatical mobs want to throw them away To commemorate and integrate "
The special type of constitutional primitiveism we propose defines as a permanent primitive law that remains fixed and authorized until the constitution is legally modified. Since the Constitution is a law, incorporating it into our legal order created a new law. The original law of this Constitution includes all legal proposals that will be effective by adding a constitution to effective legislation then. So, the constitutional primitiveism form we are discussing is a form called "sort of primitive-legal primitiveism" or persistent primitive law.
The first two incorrect laws are derived from Pierre-Simon Laplace. The first law was announced in 1774 and pointed out that the frequency of errors can be expressed as an exponential function of the magnitude of the error ignoring the sign. Laplace proposed the second law of error in 1778 and pointed out that the frequency of the error is an exponential function of the square of the error. The second law of error is called normal distribution or Gauss' law. "Historically he already knows precocity, but it is difficult to blame Gauss for this law, but he may not have this finding before he is two years old."