Prometheus2012

For the sake of clarity, this movie is certainly the first part of "alien". It provides insight into the origins of alien creatures, abandoned ships, and dead space jockey pilots in the first movie. However, these insights are only a part of Ridley Scott's plot to return to the SF genre. The film fulfilled many promises in the first 20 minutes. There, "human beings were created by aliens" but the meaning of theology and philosophy just touched. Undoubtedly, Prometheus is a wonderful movie. The commitment to the details of Scott well represents the interior of the spacecraft and the vehicle. Films and the best visual effects bring a vast sense to the movie world. Like a movie, it is replaced by a cliché and a very complex script. The movie began exploring new fields, but in the end it just steps into the same place as its predecessor. That movie became a story of such "aliens" and even warped that "crew has a secret agenda". Except for the robot David (played dramatically by Michael Fassbender), the other characters are very tedious and most people are just alien food. Since it fell, I bothered the movie with the silly moment and the number of unanswered questions. Even though Ridley Scott came back with real power, unfortunately the latest achievements of the alien team can not get rid of mediocrity. To be honest, it should have stopped the 'alien'

This is a smart and thrilling thriller that will fascinate audiences from a mysterious opening shot consisting of a group of scientists (led by Noomi Rapace) who visited a distant planet in 2093 to the open end. The hidden secret of the beginning of man and the meaning of life. From the beginning of Ridley Scott's Scottish hill, its sight is satisfactory and his film is full of atmosphere, tension, and absolute fear. "Double" excluding "Woods" recently received. Of course, this movie is not a way to master that role (but "foreigners" or "foreigners", these two movies are considered to be the best movies in history by many, including me ). It is a movie. About how to properly scare the audience old school curriculum while entering a completely persuasive philosophical spin. This movie may have expanded its "faith and science" battle, and there are some noteworthy plot loopholes that are remarkable, but still effective. Everyone is involved in a wonderful performance (Noomi Rapace, the original "Dragon Tattoo Girl", Michael Fassbinder is like a robot David). The end of hell The philosophical explosion of a defective, absolutely but still attractive, eye-catching and beautifully cinematic film, its ambiguity is frustrating and stupid

Its future and scientists can discover traces of the earliest alien visits on the earth and follow traces. Therefore, Ridley Scott began looking for humanity adventure. Exciting things, it is explained as such, but like many stories, wonderful transmissions do not guarantee even the right conclusion, this is where the story is sorry for the story to lose the ball. Unfortunately, not only because the origin of mankind is more than just a premise, but also more ominously the theme is more exciting, the origin of the cute and beautiful little nephew Sigourney Weaver fighting in the alien. This is the roller coaster I want. Fassbender has this movie as the most interesting character. What will happen next intentional mischief? Charlize Theron followed it, but it was done by Nada. Idris Elba is depicted as a masculine old-fashioned SF hero, but in an instant you will miss him. Guy Pearce exists (as another honored competitor points out), why? This makes Noomi Rapace shine in the scene, maybe I want to know the reason. Finally, the movie that shows the most important special effects in the movie is a writer.