Privacy

In the United States, the Supreme Court first approved the privacy of Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). But before Griswold, Lewis Brandis collaborated Harvard's legal review article entitled "Privacy" (before becoming the Judge of the Supreme Court), in which he is "not ignored" I insisted. That's right.

In Griswold, the Supreme Court found the right of privacy arising from the semi-shadow of other clearly defined constitutional protection. The court used the personal protection measures specified in the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 9th revisions, and the court found that the constitution implies privacy. The court found that when the people put together a penumbra, the Constitution forms a "privacy zone". The controlling stock of Griswold is given privacy, but it is used to find the couple's privacy and is limited to the right to buy contraceptives.

Also noteworthy is the agreement of Griswold's Harlan judge, which found privacy rights arising from the 14th amendment. In his consent, he is Poe v. I relied on the objection reason in Ullman (1961). In this opinion, he wrote, "I think that the legislation of Connecticut is interpreted as being applicable to these appellants and it is in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. I think that regulation uses contraceptives for couples In criminal offenses, this is an unacceptable and unreasonable intrusion of the most privacy concern privacy in personal life. "

In the privacy case after Griswold, the Supreme Court ordinarily chose to rely on the judgment of judge Harlan, not the majority opinion of Douglas Judge. Eisenstadt v Baird (1971), Roe v. Wade (1972), Lawrence v. Texas (2003) is the most prolific three lawsuits the court expanded privacy. In either case, the court relied on the 14th amendment rather than the penumbra.

In Eisenstadt, the Supreme Court has decided to expand the right to purchase contraceptives to unmarried couples. More importantly, however, the court stated that "the right of privacy protected by the constitution belongs to individuals, not couple."

The Supreme Court of Roe used the 14th amendment privacy right to expand privacy rights to include women's rights including abortion. "This right to protect privacy ... Based on the concept of 14th revision And the restriction on state behavior is enough to cover women's decision to cease pregnancy."

In Lawrence, the Supreme Court expanded the privacy to 'same-sex people involved in sexual acts' using the 14 th revision. Following the warranty of the legitimate procedure of the 14 th revision, the court stated that "the petitioner has the right to respect the private life.The state shall take down his own existence and dominate fate by criminalizing his sexual acts The right provision of the proper procedure gives them full rights to participate in their actions without government intervention. "

Dash: Privacy-focused currency (privacy coin and privacy coin: privacy coin and market map analysis privacy coin, protocol and platform: privacy coin password privacy coin block chain added privacy) is a so-called It depends on the decentralization and governance of the block chain (DGBB). DGBB uses the master node for voting. Privacy-oriented currency (Privacy coins and coins with privacy features: privacy coin and market map analysis Privacy coins, protocols, platform: for details on password privacy coins, see Move Password to Block Chain) Type (current) offline governance. In the future, decision making will proceed in a chain

This guide will explain the three most popular outlines, focusing on market capitalization, privacy coins (Monero, Dash, ZCash), and methods of privacy protection. This article is not a thorough verification of the privacy token, but there are many other promising projects in addition to those described here. Monero is aiming at a personal and non-traceable currency. In Monero, the address and transaction amount (both the sender and the recipient) related to the transaction are not disclosed in the ledger. In other words, Wallet Balance is also private. Monero protects the privacy of transactions (using it for the first time in January 2017 and approves all transactions after September 2017) using a method called Ring Confidential Transactions, this is the evolution of the ring signature . If there is no address or balance in the block chain, merchants and individuals can hide their assets.