Privacy, Exploitation, and the Digital Enclosure

In Mark Andrejevic's article "Privacy, Exploitation, and Digital Enclosure", he explored the topic of "digital closure" thoroughly and emphasized the outline of his Marxist central theme at the end of his article, he Said at that time. Regarding the use of personal data, "You do not need to update the regulatory system, but the way to build a problem is not a choice of consumers but an economic force," he says. Re-engineering of our privacy, but the power structure existing between us and the company that collects our information.

He first discussed the company's response to data collection and consumer issues with privacy issues and then turned to the explanation of his "digital chassis" philosophy. Because the digital chassis essentially means that everything you do on the web leaves some sort of record, you "close" a lot of personal data through the internet. Then, he transferred the power structure and the technique-related method to his Marxist criticism, in short, because we depend more and more on technology in everyday life, we relaunch our relationship We need to review and edit again. "Producer" of consumers and technology. The only drawback to this article is that it is very dense. There is quite a lot of information in Andrejevic's 5-page article, but this is difficult for people who are not familiar with academic writing.

Otherwise, this is a good source for this topic. Andrejevic clarifies in his opinion that this article is organized in an easy-to-understand manner and offers very good examples for his advice. He provides a brief description of the online information field and has clearly defined his meaning through the "digital chassis" and his criticism of the technical power structure was also well done. Andrejevic's work here is a wonderful starting point for those who want to understand the important influences of data tracking and online privacy.

Andrejevic, M privacy, exploitation and digital attachments Amsterdam Legal Forum, 1,47-62. It was acquired from http://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/index on May 7, 2014

To be digitally closed is the physical closure of the "second closed" movement described by the jurist James Boyle, who is devoted to "closing the invisible spiritual public land" The metaphor is in text form. It is a privatization, control and commercialization strategy of various information and intellectual property. The move described by Boyle tries to benefit from the commercialization of information and its motivation to pursue complete assimilation is cluttered and Bo format. We need to extend it to all parts - more

In Mark Andrejevic's article "Privacy, Exploitation, and Digital Enclosure", he explored the topic of "digital closure" thoroughly and emphasized the outline of his Marxist central theme at the end of his article, he Said at that time. Regarding the use of personal data, "You do not need to update the regulatory system, but the way to build a problem is not a choice of consumers but an economic force," he says. Re-engineering of our privacy, but the power structure existing between us and the company that collects our information.

He first discussed the company's response to data collection and consumer issues with privacy issues and then turned to the explanation of his "digital chassis" philosophy. Because the digital chassis essentially means that everything you do on the web leaves some sort of record, you "close" a lot of personal data through the internet. Then, he transferred the power structure and the technique-related method to his Marxist criticism, in short, because we depend more and more on technology in everyday life, we relaunch our relationship We need to review and edit again. "Producer" of consumers and technology. The only drawback to this article is that it is very dense. There is quite a lot of information in Andrejevic's 5-page article, but this is difficult for people who are not familiar with academic writing.