Preparing Evaluation Reports

The report should be well thought out, well studied, well organized, objectively evaluate what goes well, what goes wrong and why.

Method - Explain in detail the evaluation method. - Disclosure of evaluation limits, especially limitations related to evaluation

Survey results - Analyze facts, evidence, and data supported by strong quantitative or qualitative evidence, not anecdotes, rumors, or people's opinions to present survey results

Recommendation - Support for recommendations that include specific findings. - Define behavior-oriented, practical, concrete, and who to recommend

Quality management evaluates the quality report by including internal peer technical review and comments from the evaluation team.

Transparency - submit a report to the Development Experience Exchange Center (DEC) within 3 months after completion

Use the results of the evaluation report to integrate strategy, planning priorities, and project design decisions.

The following resources can be used as samples or templates. Or you can provide detailed information on the evaluation.

Report and general evaluation There are other resources, but the current USAID is outdated

USAID evaluation policy with different guidance information and USAID ADS (automation order)

· · Form of disclosure example of conflict of interest: http: //kdid.org/kdid-lab/library/DisclosConflictInterest

· Development information and evaluation publication center of International Development Agency: Style guide: guide

Evaluation report templates are intended as a guide to create meaningful, useful and reliable evaluation reports that meet quality standards. A clear section-by-section format that all evaluation reports should obey is not specified. Instead, it suggests what should be included in the quality assessment report. The following statements from the UNEG "UN System Evaluation Criteria" and "Ethical Standards for Evaluation" .66 assessment report should be arranged in a complete and logical manner. It should be clearly understood and understood by the intended audience. In the context of the country, the report should be translated as far as possible into the local language (see Chapter 8 for details). This report should also include the following.

- Evaluation of the initial report - The evaluator needs to prepare the initial report before performing the complete data collection. Evaluator's understanding of what is being evaluated, why it is explained in detail, and the proposed method, the proposed data source, and how to answer each evaluation question by the data collection process. In the initial report you need to name the team members who are responsible for each task or product, including the proposed timeline for tasks, activities, deliverables. The first report verifies that the planner and evaluator have the same understanding of the evaluation and provides the opportunity to clarify the misunderstanding from the beginning.