Poverty and Social Inequalities in the Structure of Society

Social inequality in poverty and social structure can have different definitions Contradictory views on poverty may also have different views on the causes of poverty and the measurement of poverty. For example, Marxists and feminists have conflict-based ideologies. Marxists believe there is a class struggle and exploitation produced by capitalism can cause poverty. Feminists believe that patriarchalism is based on social inequality and believe that inequality in wages between men and women also reflects their ideology.

According to sociologists, they have various theories of poverty. Structural function theory of poverty further motivates poverty to rise as a specific function of society, motivates poverty and inequality as a specific function of society, and further explains poverty, There is a function. On the other hand, the theory of conflict of poverty problem is related to proletariat and bourgeoisie, disparity of wealth, and conflict that causes change. One of the causes of the most rooted poverty in the world is social inequality. This arises from the cultural concept of relative values ​​of different gender, race, ethnicity, social class. The role due to inequality is to classify individuals into different social categories at birth, usually based on religious, racial or "racial" characteristics (poverty).

Social inequality means unequal opportunities and rewards in different social positions, or in groups and societies. There are two ways to explain why there is poverty. One explanation is to blame the poor and the other is to blame the society. Social inequality affects various aspects of our lives, including health, values, attitudes, politics, and child rearing methods.

Sociologists do not agree on the cause of social stratification, but they are united and social inequality is the structural aspect of modern life as society as a whole. In the structure of social inequality, social scientists do not only mean that individuals and social groups differ in their privileges, their fame, and the power they have. Structure means that inequality in society is institutionalized as a system. Inequalities are not formed randomly, they are based on a relatively consistent and repeating stable model. Normally it is inherited from generation to generation, individuals and groups with profits often find the right way (Crompton 54-58)

Social inequality exists in almost every society. Social inequality is determined by various structural factors such as geographical location and citizenship and is based on cultural discourse and identity such as whether the poor are "worth" or "not worth" I often do. In a simple society, the social society and social inequality rarely occupied by its members may be very low. For example, in a tribal society, tribal leaders and directors may have specific privileges, use specific tools, or mark offices for other officers who can not access, but the secretary's daily life It is very similar to the daily life of others. Members of other tribes. Anthropologists regard this very equalitarian culture as "relative oriented". It seems that emphasis is placed on social harmony rather than wealth and status. These cultures are in stark contrast to substance-oriented culture where place and wealth are emphasized, competition and conflict are common.