Population Reduction: The Method for Economic Growth?

Until recently, the term "population growth" has been considered positive, but there are still many people who believe that population growth will lead to economic growth. We discuss whether many people need to reduce our total number, but others are discussing what these effects are. Not only does our population influence the economy, our environment, education, quality of life, and everything around us depend on how we deal with this growing problem. As our population is increasing, we must decide how to respond and how our actions will affect.

While there are few systematic studies on the impact of population growth on economic growth in the discussion. If the increase in total production is not affected by population growth, there is a possibility that there is a negative correlation between population growth and economic growth. In this case, as the population growth rate increases, the increase in per capita output will also decrease correspondingly. The scientific community generally accepts speculation that population growth hinders economic development. In past studies as well, there is a negative correlation between these two variables such as Hazledine and Moreland (1977), Jackman (1982), McNicoll (1984), Coale (1986), Bloom and Freeman (1988), Kelley and Schmidt Yes. (1994, 1995) and Barlow (1994)

In this paper, we are trying to find a correlation between population growth and economic growth in Indonesia. The relationship between population growth and economic growth has been controversial over a century ago. Regarding this issue, it is well known that there are two main ideas of (i) the Malthus school and (ii) the non-Malthus school (Boserupian). Malthus argues that while the population is increasing at a geometric rate, the supply of food is increasing at an arithmetic rate. Therefore, the Malthus school concluded that population growth adversely affects overall economic growth.

The infinite growth of the definition of the United Nations (population and economy) is completely inconsistent with the extraction of infinite resources from limited supplies. We believe that infinite growth on the earth with limited resources must be over As sustainable development goals and worldwide risks can not cope with the interests of large companies and can not cope with the outbreak of poverty, development and GDP growth The problem is not suspected. Target and risk assumptions should predict and manage poverty, but can not disappear. Neither the United Nations nor the World Economic Forum recognize that eradication of poverty leads to the collapse of the entire legal bidding system in the world. The underlying assumption is that poverty should not be eradicated, as poverty supports the existing institutions.