Population policies, programmes and the environment

After the publication of "Population Bomb" (Ehrlich 1968) and the first "Earth Day" by Paul Erlich, the population was recognized environmental problems from the late 1960s to the early 1970s. However, over 30 years ago, due to at least three factors, the population seems to drastically reduce the task of environmental movement. (Ii) the political superiority of the White House and Congress in the United States, primarily the anti-environmental environment, (iii) the US to cope directly with biodiversity and climate change Changing priority in environmental movement Threat

In parallel with these movements, activists and foreign aid providers who are interested in population policy and programs are increasingly paying attention to reproductive health, especially HIV / AIDS, to ensure family planning and other reproductive health programs . It fulfills the individual needs of women and men and becomes completely autonomous (Germain & Kyte 1995). We are not paying much attention to the demographic reasons and impacts of the demographic planning, and thus the environmental impact. Supporters of family planning and reproductive health in the US like environmentally conscious colleagues, try to limit the importance of sustaining population growth or limit people trying to avoid pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases Medical selection (STI)

While it is urgently necessary to protect the natural system by reducing the degradation and depletion of natural resources, this paper attempted to focus on the importance of demographic trends for environmental sustainability I will. It identifies the prevention of unnecessary pregnancies as potential commonalities for government policy makers, environmentalist, and family plan advocates. Health benefits and other benefits of preventing unwanted pregnancies are most directly experienced by individual women, men and their families. At the same time, preventing unwanted pregnancy often leads to family miniaturization. This is an important factor in delaying population growth, leading to broader benefits for society, including those that impact the environment.

The indicator model developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the implementation and monitoring of DPAS establishes the foundation of the behavioral framework, and how supportive environments, policies and programs influence behavioral change of the population, sustainable Environment, society, health and economy. Benefits The elements of monitoring and evaluation provide the basis for promotion, policy planning and action. This model consists of an upstream (social - ecological) approach designed to shape economic, social, and physical (constructive and natural) environments and a midstream (lifestyle) designed to directly influence behavior ) Emphasize the need to properly combine approaches. And downstream (health services) methods (Sacks, Swinburn and Lawrence 2008) to support health services and clinical intervention

An effective and realistic population policy aims to ensure that the economic and social development rates exceed the population growth rate. The government believes that this goal will be achieved if the demographic plan is planned and implemented in the integrated development context. The main objective of this policy is to unify the population growth rate and the capacity of the country to develop natural resources and to reasonably use it and ultimately maximize the welfare of the population. The need to achieve this goal depends on the fact that the combination of the major state of technology development and the rapid increase in population has made it difficult for the country to get out of serious undevelopment.

Pursue development of economic growth (Collier, 2014). The environment is part of the past decades policy and the main focus on the environment comes from population growth, resource depletion, climate change and biodiversity loss. After these big problems, two major problems emerge in the environment. It is an external factor and the commons tragedy. Climate change is the price of economic activity and is a problem that causes problems.