Political legitimacy has gone too far The purpose of the "political legitimacy" campaign is to celebrate historically high-profile articles, unpleasant music, art, controversial content of education, to make them more vigorous and criminal Replace with less reference. The aggressive and low morale effort is wrong, but if you review and delete words and phrases that do not contain low morale, the political legitimacy becomes very serious. A politically correct (or "PC") refutment causes social decline, especially in the arts, education, language and freedom of speech, all generations are getting worse. The degradation they bring
However, apart from some examples that are easily rejected, the idea that political legitimacy goes too far is irrational. Men are proud of his genitals to catch women, ridicule journalists, and shape Muslims as "terrorists". Mexican as a "rapist" that can become a free world leader In fact, people who call "political legitimacy" often use it for more cynical means. It is a regression-based smoke screen. Let's go back to Mr. Shriver's claim. It is not bound by reality. "Homosexual Transgender" Where can a dropout in a Caribbean primary school easily get a book, where are all the books for these people? To make matters worse, her dichotomy between population diversity and precious literature suggests that non-whites and heterosexual writers create inferior literary works.
My argument is that the political legitimacy movement is overkill. Although the intention of the original political justification may be good (it encourages tact and sensitivity to others' feelings such as sex, race, religion, sexual orientation, physical ability etc.), political legitimacy Sexual influence has always been to avoid all these completely Topics - In this way to interfere with the comfort of life and work with people different from us. So far, political justification has become a bigger problem than the problem it is trying to solve!
In the past few years, articles from critics of various political disciplines have warned that the recent rise of "political legitimacy" has gone too far. Not surprisingly, after the most stunning US presidential election in recent history, many authorities condemn mainstream media elections of millions of people voting for terrible mistakes and actually Donald Trump It was to be. It is an aggressive member on the left that is promoting too aggressively due to "identity politics" or "political correctness". Their argument is that if the Democrats abandon all nonsense of these "political legitimacy" (either explicitly or implicitly) they can regain a lot of voters.