Eugene invited me to generously invite me to introduce my new book "Battle of the Police." According to the book, the story of Black Lives Matter on racist criminal justice system is false and dangerous - the innocent black life lost by the rise in crime rate is dangerous,
This week, a new study by the New York Times made a stir with the ongoing national debate on race and police. "The amazing new evidence shows that the police are using force instead of shooting prejudice," the title says. For the following few days, those who opposed conservative media and police efforts to violence backed this research as "evidence" that the fear of racial prejudice at the police was wrong. In this survey it was found that there was racial prejudice in the use of force by other forms of police, but the discovery of police shooting cases was highlighted by the media. Therefore, evidence from the whole research organization shows a racial bias in police shooting (eg reading this research and this research). But the results of the research are at best uncertain, and the worst is very suspicious
I wrote this survey to investigate the correlation between race and shooting death by the police. I have done a couple of studies and I realized that I think there seems to be a major flaw in the study I read: the proportion of police killed by racial killings is proportional to the proportion of the general population only. . Note: Each data set is represented only as a percentage of the total number of black and white citizens (that is, I do not include other racial or ethnic data). This was done to explain the difference between the method of collecting census data (Hispanics were not regarded as race) and the method of collecting shooting death data (Hispanics is considered racial). I separated the citizen data of white and black people and tried to eliminate this difference.