Police discretion is the problem I want to solve. In this article I will explain the problems I have, the discretionary issues that I have, and how some officials get superiority with discretion. Through paper conclusions, readers will receive education on discretion and the problems they face. Pollock (2010) defines discretion as "the right to choose from more than two lawsuits." Experts in law enforcement agencies are responsible for enforcement of the law, how to enforce the law, and dispute resolution methods I have great freedom in discretion, when applying force, etc.
Using police discretion is a positive aspect of the status of police officers for various reasons. By using discretion, police officers can gain the necessary flexibility to carry out their duties. It also allows the police to quickly interpret applicable laws and then act on decisions. In other words, regulation may indicate that the act is illegal; and the police can quickly arrest based on his explanation. In addition, the use of discretion will help to promote the police and the justice economy. If the police negotiate with other staff or have to go to the judge every time they need to work, this will not only lead to economic losses but will also lead to the loss of law enforcement agencies and the entire judicial system .
In the field of police, instructors, legislators and commentators often use the term. That word is "discretion". Police have the right and the opportunity to act in accordance with their discretion to arrest people, arrest them and use forces to perform arrests. The idea of the police discretion is that the law should be flexible in several ways to ensure that the spirit of the law is fulfilled. Whenever large laws are passed, as long as the law is observed, it can lead to unfairness. So what does the police discretion mean? How is it applied?