Plato's Response to Thrasymachus' Immoralist View of Justice

In the first volume of the Republic, Plato answered immoral views of Trashimachus' justice, and Socrates answered the question "What is justice". A practical and dangerous alternative was proposed. He thought it was the truth about justice. Julia Annas believes that Trasimachus believes that justice and injustice exist independently of the human system; and Trashimachus has made a firm commitment to injustice. She called this view "immoralism": "Non-moralists believe there is an important problem of better justice by showing injustice." Types of "immoral" view

In Plato's "Republic", we, the reader are presented with two persons who oppose simple but elusive questions: What is justice? In this article, I will explain the definition of justice of Trashimachus and the differences of opinion and opinion of Socrates. In addition, I will comment on various discussions raised by Socrates and Trashimakos and provide critical comments and examples to explain the consent of my particular opponent's particular discussion or disagreement. - The Socrates 'description through "Book of Socrates' Death and Death" has produced considerable controversial features in Western history. In many ways, Socrates changed the notion of common philosophy of ancient Greece; he changed the philosophical view from a way to study things to a consideration. Specifically, he analyzed the virtue and health of the human soul.

An understanding of the late work of the Republic of Plato will tell us that Plato introduced his view at this moment to contrast with the justice theory that Socrates subsequently defended. In Plato's theory of justice, doing fair things is good for everyone. This is in stark contrast to Trasimachus' view that Trasimachus believes that justice is an advantage of a strong person (the ruling party). "Socrates, it is necessary to know that some countries are governed by tyrants, some are governed by democratic majority, and some are governed by small aristocracy. Regardless of who controls in their law - the ruler's advantage - they say that justice is followed after they pass these laws Those who do not comply with the laws are unjust Because I will be considered a violator, my good person is what I call justice.

Angelino 1 I will discuss the new content on the legitimacy of trashimachu which is now taking place in Plato in the first and second Republic. First I will present Plato's project plan in its historical and cultural context. Well, I will refer to "Solon and Thucydides" to show that the functional concept of Thrasymachus represents a common cultural concept to Prato when writing the Republic. Close to Plato. In his account of Athens' attitude toward justice, it provides a close source of comparison with Plato. Then I will study the important steps taken by the Republic Thrasymachus and Glaucon. Many of these steps correspond to the opposition of Socrates. Finally, we extract logical propositions from these paragraphs. Through a clearly implied proposition and an intermediate conclusion, I prove that the position of Trashimachu provides a compatible view on justice.