Republic of Plato - Republic seeking justice and kindness Plato is often treated as a statement about politics, politics, society, law. This is certainly not a quick interpretation of the dialogue; it is called the Republic, and over half of it is through the use of speech to build a city, complete government structure, military, economic system and legitimate cities is. However, I think it is inaccurate to regard the Republic as a political statement. Socrates and his colleagues built a city where speech can not be controlled while trying to define justice, but this dialogue will be seen as something that justice can not be established through a fixed system.
Republic of Plato (427 - 347 BC) is the basic sentence of political philosophy, the first sentence of Western civilization to validate the problem of justice with the most rigorous scrutiny. Writing dialogue took place around 411 BC. Plato's teacher Socrates (399 BC)
Let's start from Plato Republic where we started. The first starting point of political philosophy may be a republic. Plato's theory of justice and thought represents the political and ideological paradigm of the next century. In his masterpiece, Plato shows that there is an important relationship between political life and the ideal form of intangible realm. Plato's city state is a physical expression of the permanent form of justice that exists in this invisible field. In other words, Plato has a metaphysical paradigm with a political system. Likewise, there is a metaphysical justice paradigm which is a locus of justice that determines the shapes of justice cities and individuals of justice. According to Plato, the function and purpose of the ideal ruler philosopher king is to shape and rule the city according to the form of justice.
In Plato's work "Republic" there is a question as to whether the existence exists systematically. Because the Republic itself is an attempt to answer questions about human behavior, that is justice. In order to solve the problem of justice, Plato considers the relationship between the ideal city state, the autonomous collective unit, and the realization of the structure and justice of the republic. Plato thinks that the philosopher's king ought to be the ruler, as all philosophers are trying to find an ideal city state. "Calipolis" or a beautiful city is a legitimate city, political control depends on knowledge, the philosopher's king owns not power but power. In theory, it would be ideal if republics and modern states were dominated by knowledge rather than power, power is extremely important in the composition of political activities. This is a flaw in the discussion of Plato, which will be discussed in this paper. At the same time, some features of contemporary countries are consistent with an ideal city city that is inevitable.