Plato and Aristotle's Impact on Rhetoric

Plato and Aristotle are two rhetoricists and do not significantly affect the history of rhetoric. They are similar in many respects, but the usage and the rhetoric definition are different. Plato has a more classical approach to using rhetoric as an educational tool to convey his beliefs and rhetorical practice to his students. He believes that it should be used to educate the public, stimulate ideas, and therefore protect knowledge. Plato believes that rhetoric should convey the truth and should be used to reveal the truth that the audience already know through dialectical critical thinking.

Classical rhetoric theory is dominated by the idea of ​​Aristotle and Plato. Plato is interested in comparing the limits of the rhetoric he is seeing (dialogue topic, Gorgias, cooking and rhetoric comparison) with the ideal rhetoric limitation offered at Pbaedrus. Aristotle tends to summarize rhetorical guidance and develop a practical approach than Plato's moral perspective on this subject. Aristotle's rhetoric - in fact the editing of his student's memo on his lecture - provides the first systematic and comprehensive rhetorical thesis

Plato and Aristotle are two rhetoricists and do not significantly affect the history of rhetoric. They are similar in many respects, but the usage and the rhetoric definition are different. Plato has a more classical approach to using rhetoric as an educational tool to convey his beliefs and rhetorical practice to his students. He believes that it should be used to educate the public, stimulate ideas, and therefore protect knowledge. -  Doing places with water: Aristotle gives the environment the role of sickness. This is a complement to the four humor in his work: "the nature of man". One example is the northerners, due to indifference by places and elements of winter. People in Africa are attributed to bile because the climate there is similar to that of summer elements. Air, water, places make people think that the environment is due to disease