Plato and Aristotle: Divergent Theories on Knowledge

Plato and Aristotle lived in the same period, but both philosophers developed two different knowledge theories. To define knowledge, Plato uses the dialogue between his dialogue Theaetetus, especially knowledge between Socrates and Theaetetus, division line graphs and cave fables. In the Theetetus dialogue, Plato introduced three definitions of knowledge proposed by Theaetetus. He, Theaetetus, pointed out that with Socrates stimulation knowledge is recognized as [Aistheta] or Protagoras as "human measure".

In this article, I oppose the knowledge theory Prat gives about republic splitting lines. I distinguish between the differences and similarities between the epistemological concept of Plato and Aristotle. These are intended to explain how people acquire knowledge and acquire knowledge. As support, I will explain Plato's formal theory and Aristotle's essential theory. Because they are directly related to the true view of knowledge. Plato's formalism is epistemology and ontology

Aristotle's criticism against the plateau's formal theory is a major theme and is still expanding. Aristotle does not quote Plato and it often gathers up. The classic commentary therefore endorsed Aristotle as an introduction to Plato. As historians of the past, Aristotle is irreplaceable, but this is a secondary factor in his own dialectic dialect, sometimes dealing with so-called influences as Plato actually said. They also protected them. When studying criticisms of Aristotle's "form", it is beneficial to understand Aristotle's own ghost forms and he intends to preserve Plato's theory largely through this form.

Plato's student philosopher Aristotle opposed Plato and his theory. Aristotle believes that shapes exist, but they are part of every object, and our senses finally tell us what this subject is. He is an early materialist. Plato's theory is expressed by cave fables and split line theory. Because they are very similar, Aristotle's views on this issue are quite different.