Pie in the Sky

From the 1960's to the 1970's, sky pie gathered people who were exposed in quirky ways around Andy Warhol. She likes her "underground" celebrity marrying her appropriately conservative parents. Her father, a friend of Richard M. Nixon, admirer of senator Joseph R. McCarthy, and Hearst (Hearst) managed by Richard Berlin, he helped to avoid bankruptcy in the 1940s. Her mother is sociable, dear, elegant, feminine based lunch style.

I recently listened to Gary Vaynerchuck 's #askgaryvee show, but I noticed many trends of questions raised by his fans. They are all empty big problems. Their problem is just the smoke of the other things they really want to answer. For example (I will explain): If this person really wants to be a consultant at the nail salon, she does not have to go to the top of the mountain like Gary Vaynerchuck. Everything she needs is practical and begins to ask herself the right questions. You have to do six (or seven) numbers, you must have everything you always wanted and you have to think about ways to build it today, next week and next month. Thinking like this will constitute a whole new and more useful problem. For all the emerging entrepreneurs / businessmen, there are some basic proposals on how these problems should be.

Is this pie sky? No, it is already happening, but with the exception of policies, analysts and futurists like myself, it is a slow and invisible way for anyone. The industry is aware of this. The motto of the campaign has been slowly established over ten years, so everyone in the healthcare industry is aware of the phrase "quantity and value". This is an abbreviation for "you need to stop making money on a quantity basis - how many of the items in the list can be charged - and the real value to earn money , Degree of health. "

Do not listen to it as an empty pie, a dreamer's pleasure. Some people embody the darkness, insist on the right, they do not respect humanity, create and create God. Everything is black and white. They exploit others from the place of power and privilege. They abuse and ignore creation. (Of course, "they" are "us.") These problems are clearly resolved and must be judged in the case. But in my opinion, the conversation begins with starting light from darkness, discordant peace, mercy and injustice by strict observance of legitimacy and narrow approach. To be honest, I see more doctrine, I argue with all sacrifice, not discrimination, wisdom and acceptance.