Philosophy of History

Since the death of 1831, the question of whether Hegel 's historical philosophy is effective is a topic that has been widely discussed among philosophers, historians, and many others. From the beginning to the end, lectures on historical philosophy have received various critical reviews. Explain it. Joseph McCartney acknowledged that Hegel 's historical philosophy failed to maintain its status as a coherent existence. " "Since the mid 1930's, it began to divide into" old "or" correct "Hegelian," young ". In addition, Hegel's historical philosophy is expressed as being very diverse and ambiguous, being a "left" Hegelian and fighting "the center" (Mc Carney, 4: 2000). "Hthledge, 216: 1998) In this article we will learn about the central elements of Hegel's historical philosophy, especially the center, the concept of freedom.

Hegel was the first major philosopher to place importance on history and historical philosophy. Hegel's historicism is that all human societies (and all human activities such as science, art, philosophy, etc.) are defined by their history and that they can find their essence only through understanding. According to Hegel, we need to understand why people are such people. In order to understand society we need to put this person in society, we need to understand its history and the ability to shape it . He says that "philosophy is the history of philosophy"

A good history of philosophy is a contribution to philosophy. It helps to understand the essence of philosophy - philosophy research, explanation and division is philosophy. In addition, a good history provides an environment that enhances the quality of behavior. The history of philosophy provides an environment for philosophical behavior. After fully understanding Western philosophy and thinking, the next step is to place and spread this idea. In a sense, both objectives can be achieved through parallel research in Western and non - Western systems. And, as mentioned above, it is considered that "other systems are highly unlikely to be influenced by Western Europe". The outcome of Western experience through empiricism is complemented by the ubiquity in other systems. This description is, of course, polarized and simplified.