Philosophy and Natural Law

Philosophy Humans are social animals and depend on each other to fulfill their needs, but their lives are somewhat unstable without proper governance laws and institutions. In the absence of the government there is no single authority to decide how to impose the requirements of natural law and its requirements. Evidently, everyone is equal, so each of them is entitled to punish offenders by forcing the laws of nature and is free.

In the 5 th century of Athens, a unique philosophy of natural law appeared clearly. The opposite view has penetrated Greek thought not only in philosophy but also in history and literature, but the most important is tragedy. The most powerful of Sophocles' tragedy is that he is deeply discussing the meaning and meaning of human existence. Rather, it is whether human existence has more meaning and meaning than that event. As Jocasta told Oedipus, the final situation is "all opportunities" 4, or is there a bigger stage for human life? Like Plato, they believe in the order of nature, and those people, especially the Sophist, think that whatever deeply rooted the order is designed by humans. I have imposed it. The concept of natural order (physical) other than an artificial instruction (nomos) is not just a simple causal order

Legal philosophy, also known as law, is a field of philosophy that studies the nature of the law, especially using human values, attitudes, practices, and political communities. Traditionally, legal philosophy is implemented by defining and advocating propositions on general and abstract laws, that is to say not at all times but rather at specific times (eg the United Kingdom of 1900) rather than propositions of a particular legal system I came. There are all the laws. Legal philosophy is usually designed to distinguish laws from other normative systems, such as morality (see morality) and other social customs. Therefore, legal philosophy is more generally an integral part of philosophy.

In the mainstream legal philosophy, law interpretation is closest to legal interpretation. Legal interpretiveism is conceptually located between two major subfields of legal philosophy, namely legal positivism and natural law theory. The mainstream philosophical law has many aspects including legal realism, legal formalism, legal practicalism and legal process theory, but other theories, legal positivism and natural law theory, It constitutes the theoretical two pole between the two mainstream theory can be understood to be arranged. Roughly speaking, legal positivism has no inevitable relationship between law and morality and claims that the law has no justification or authority to consider morality (Feinberg and Coleman 2008; Patterson 2003). For legal proofists, the validity of the law is determined not by its moral content but by specific social facts (Hart 1958, 1961; Dickson 2001; Coleman 2001; Gardner 2001).